VS

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Toyota C-HR – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Toyota C-HR?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Avant @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55200 £. That’s a price difference of around 26108 £.

As for range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant performs decisively better – achieving up to 716 km, about 648 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR @ Toyota

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant has a convincingly edge – offering 551 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 328 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant performs evident better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

A6 e-tron Avant @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Toyota C-HR is significantly lighter – 1505 kg compared to 2185 kg. The difference is around 680 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers a bit more room – 502 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant performs to a small extent better – up to 1422 L, which is about 267 L more than the Toyota C-HR.

When it comes to payload, Audi A6 e-tron Avant a bit takes the win – 500 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £55,200
A243176_medium

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 17 kWh
  • Electric Range : 539 - 716 km
details

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant seamlessly blends cutting-edge electric performance with the brand's signature luxury and practicality. Its sleek design and spacious interior make it an ideal choice for those seeking both style and functionality in their electric vehicle. With advanced technology and a commitment to sustainability, the A6 e-tron Avant sets a new standard for performance-oriented family cars.

details
A243176_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A243167_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com
A243148_medium @ audi-mediacenter.com

Toyota C-HR

5 (1)
rate

The Toyota C-HR stands out with its distinctive and bold design that combines sleek, angular lines with a sporty posture. Its comfortable and stylish interior is equipped with advanced technology features, providing a seamless driving experience. The vehicle offers impressive handling and performance, making it a compelling choice for those who appreciate a blend of practicality and flair on the road.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr @ Toyota
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr @ Toyota
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr @ Toyota
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr @ Toyota
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr @ Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla are two compelling options for drivers seeking reliability and style. While the C-HR boasts a bold, crossover design with a higher driving position and sporty handling, the Corolla remains a benchmark in compact sedans, offering practicality and exceptional fuel efficiency. Choosing between them ultimately comes down to personal preference for aesthetics and lifestyle needs, as both models deliver impressive features and Toyota's renowned reliability.
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Toyota C-HR
A6 e-tron Avant
C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
55200 - 100100 £
Price
29100 - 42800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
Electric Range
68 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
17 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2185 - 2410 kg
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
4928 mm
Length
4362 mm
Width
1923 mm
Width
1832 mm
Height
1504 - 1527 mm
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
Max trunk capacity
1422 L
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether buyers prioritize style and affordability or luxury and innovation.
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR present compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers seeking a stylish and efficient crossover. The Niro, with its hybrid and electric options, emphasizes fuel economy and a spacious interior, making it ideal for families or those with cargo needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR offers a more dynamic exterior design, appealing to those who prioritize a bold aesthetic alongside a spirited driving experience.
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their unique blend of style and performance. The LBX offers a more luxurious interior and advanced features, while the C-HR remains a budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on flair. Ultimately, both vehicles cater to different tastes, making the choice between them a reflection of personal preferences in luxury and practicality.
Nissan Juke
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Juke and Toyota C-HR both offer unique appeal but cater to different driving preferences. The Juke stands out with its distinctive design and agile handling, appealing to those who favor a more spirited drive. Meanwhile, the C-HR impresses with its futuristic styling and standard advanced safety features, making it an attractive choice for tech-savvy drivers prioritizing safety and innovation.
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to those who value versatility. Ultimately, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making the choice between them largely dependent on personal preference and lifestyle needs.
Renault Captur
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Renault Captur and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinct designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Captur impresses with its customizable interior options and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a practical choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the C-HR offers a more sporty driving experience and a striking exterior, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality.
Kia XCeed
Toyota C-HR
VS
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it an ideal choice for families. On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR impresses with its bold design and fuel efficiency, appealing to younger, style-conscious buyers. Ultimately, the decision between these two popular models will depend on individual priorities, as both offer a blend of performance and versatility.
What drivetrain options does the Audi A6 e-tron Avant have?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.