VS

Audi A6 Limousine vs Volvo XC40 – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi A6 Limousine or Volvo XC40?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 Limousine @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC40 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Audi A6 Limousine costs 47600 £. That’s a price difference of around 10809 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi A6 Limousine manages with 2.20 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 4.30 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 Limousine has a convincingly edge – offering 367 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 Limousine is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.70 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi A6 Limousine performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A6 Limousine pulls decisively stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

A6 Limousine @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is barely noticeable lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1845 kg. The difference is around 157 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi A6 Limousine offers barely noticeable more room – 492 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

When it comes to payload, Audi A6 Limousine slightly takes the win – 625 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi A6 Limousine proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi A6 Limousine is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £47,600
A185651_overfull

Audi A6 Limousine

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 367 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.2 - 6.9 L
  • Electric Range : 97 - 105 km
details

Audi A6 Limousine

The Audi A6 Limousine seamlessly blends sophistication with performance, embodying the perfect balance between comfort and dynamic driving. Its sleek design and meticulously crafted interior provide an elegant atmosphere, while the advanced technology enhances the driving experience. With a reputation for reliability and innovation, the A6 stands out in the executive saloon segment, appealing to drivers who appreciate both style and substance.

details
A185651_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A185640_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A185643_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A185645_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A185033_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 is a standout model in the compact SUV segment, offering a delightful blend of Scandinavian design and practicality. Its interior is both stylish and functional, featuring premium materials and innovative storage solutions that make every journey comfortable. The car's performance is smooth and responsive, with advanced safety features ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ media.volvocars.com
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a plush cabin, class-leading safety tech and Scandinavian style, so pay extra if you want flair, refinement and that "I’m-driving-something-special" feeling.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go Kuga; if you prefer a calmer, premium feel and a car that looks after you like a very fashionable safety blanket, choose the XC40.
Audi A6 Limousine
Volvo XC40
A6 Limousine
XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
47600 - 68100 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.2 - 6.9 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
97 - 105 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
20.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
49 - 157 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1845 - 2220 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 492 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4999 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1875 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1452 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
535 - 625 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 8.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
243 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
340 - 550 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1968 - 2995 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more personality for less cash.
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.
Toyota Corolla Cross
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible, wallet-friendly compact SUV that delivers Toyota reliability, efficient engines and roomy practicality for everyday life, while the Volvo XC40 trades bargain-basement charm for premium materials, sharper handling and a cocoon of Scandinavian safety tech. If you want low running costs and uncomplicated usefulness, the Corolla Cross is your no-nonsense winner; if you prefer style, advanced driver aids and a badge that subtly screams “I care about safety (and design),” splurge on the XC40.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, catering to different preferences in the increasingly popular market.
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking luxury and peace of mind. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether practicality or premium comfort takes precedence in your driving experience.
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether buyers prioritize style and affordability or luxury and innovation.
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a reputation for safety and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two distinctive models hinges on personal preferences for driving engagement versus everyday usability.
What drive types are available for the Audi A6 Limousine?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.