Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q3 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Ford Puma?
Audi Q3 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,314 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 298 km more than the Audi Q3.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers visibly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Q3
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries moderately more – 535 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £38,200
Audi Q3
Audi Q3
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q3
The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Audi Q3
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.