VS

Audi Q3 vs Ford Puma – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q3 or Ford Puma?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Audi Q3 costs 38200 £. That’s a price difference of around 13457 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q3 manages with 1.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 3.70 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs convincingly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 257 km more than the Audi Q3.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 has a evident edge – offering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs slightly better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q3 pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

Q3 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1635 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers hardly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q3 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1386 L, which is about 103 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q3 somewhat takes the win – 535 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q3 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £38,200
A188605_overfull

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details

Audi Q3

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q3 seamlessly blends practicality with luxury, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers and adventure seekers alike. With its striking design and sophisticated interior, the Q3 offers a premium driving experience that caters to both comfort and style. As a compact SUV, it effortlessly navigates through city streets while providing ample space for passengers and cargo.

details
A188605_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188610_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188613_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1814467_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188626_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Audi Q3
Ford Puma
Q3
Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
38200 - 52900 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4531 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1859 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1559 - 1601 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
1196 - 1386 L
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
208 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and CUPRA Terramar stand out with their distinct design and performance characteristics. The Q3 impresses with its polished interior and advanced technology, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize luxury and comfort. Meanwhile, the CUPRA Terramar offers a sportier driving experience, blending dynamic handling with a unique flair that appeals to enthusiast drivers looking for something more spirited.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.