VS

Audi Q3 vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Ford Puma?

Audi Q3 vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,314 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 298 km more than the Audi Q3.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers visibly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries moderately more – 535 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
Audi Q3
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
Audi Q3
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.