VS

Audi Q3 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Toyota C-HR+?

Audi Q3 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat lighter
  • moderately more trunk space

Toyota C-HR+

  • barely cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota C-HR+ is barely cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,237 £.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers clearly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 488 km more than the Audi Q3.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers markedly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 62 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is somewhat lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers moderately more boot space – 488 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries moderately more – 655 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Audi Q3
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Kia EV4 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The electric Kia EV4 Hatchback — slick, tech-packed and built for range-minded commutes — goes head-to-head with the quirky, style-first Toyota C‑HR+, a compact crossover that favours personality and frugal running costs. By the end of this DriveDuel showdown we’ll tell you which one deserves your …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR+
VS
When the Lexus LBX squares off against the Toyota C-HR+, you're looking at badge-driven luxury versus clever value in the same compact package. We'll sort out which car looks better in the driveway, feels sharper behind the wheel, and — crucially — makes more sense for your money (spoiler: it's not …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Audi Q3
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q3 have?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.