VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Atto 3 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or BYD Atto 3?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Atto 3: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • marginally more trunk space
details

BYD Atto 3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

BYD Atto 3 is marginally cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,152 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers a bit more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 82 km more than the BYD Atto 3.

Atto 3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers markedly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 119 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is marginally lighter – 1,880 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 155 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers marginally more boot space – 535 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries very slightly more – 530 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Atto 2 comes down to whether you need more range, space and performance or a smaller, more affordable city EV. The Atto 3 delivers stronger power, longer driving range and more interior room, while the Atto 2 focuses on compact dimensions, efficiency and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Atto 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
BYD Atto 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Toyota C‑HR pits an all-electric, tech-focused compact against Toyota’s familiar crossover offering, so it’s really a choice between EV practicality and proven petrol/hybrid versatility. Think about daily range and charging convenience if you lean toward the Atto 3, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Seal U shows two distinct approaches: the Atto 3 is a compact, comfort-oriented electric crossover focused on practicality and value, while the Seal U is a sleeker, performance-oriented fastback with sharper handling and longer-range options. This comparison …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and the MG MG5 EV take different approaches to electric motoring: the Atto 3 is a compact crossover that emphasizes tech, comfort and a modern cabin, while the MG MG5 EV is a practical electric estate focused on space and value. This comparison will help you choose between a stylish, …
BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Ford Explorer EV represent two different takes on the electric SUV — the Atto 3 is a compact, value-packed package while the Explorer EV aims at larger families with more range and performance. I’ll walk you through their real-world range, practicality, driving character and …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the MG MGS6 EV helps buyers decide between BYD’s compact, tech-focused electric crossover and MG’s contender that prioritizes practicality and value. Below I’ll outline the key differences in range, performance, interior quality and equipment so you can pick the one …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Atto 3

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
490 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,875 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
530 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
BYD
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.