Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Mazda CX-80?
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q4 e-tron is noticeably cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,614 £.
As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers significantly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 532 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers very slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 129 Nm more.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more boot space – 535 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 277 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.