Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda MX-30 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (39,600 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Mazda MX-30?
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda MX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,709 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers substantially more range – reaching up to 554 km, about 469 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
MX-30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is somewhat lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 186 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers visibly more boot space – 535 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 185 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,490 L, about 335 L more than the Mazda MX-30.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries visibly more – 515 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 113 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,600
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,600 - 58,800 £
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
22 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
|
Length
4,588 mm
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,614 - 1,632 mm
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,460 - 1,490 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.