VS

Audi Q5 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (367 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (46,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q5 or Mazda CX-80?

Audi Q5 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi Q5

4.4 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • significantly more trunk space

Mazda CX-80

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q5 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 46,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,957 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q5 uses 2.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q5 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 100 km, about 40 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q5 offers somewhat more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q5 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q5 delivers marginally more torque with 580 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Q5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q5 is moderately lighter – 1,910 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 221 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q5 offers significantly more boot space – 520 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 262 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 565 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,400
Q5

Audi Q5

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 367 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 92 - 100 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q5
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Are you after classic polish or cheeky performance? We pit the Audi Q5’s grown-up refinement against the Cupra Terramar’s eager sportiness to see which mid-size SUV earns your money—and your grin.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Audi Q5
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q5

The Audi Q5 feels like the sensible luxury choice — polished cabin materials, a calm ride and enough tech to keep commuters and weekend adventurers equally pleased. It won't shout for attention but will quietly check the boxes for buyers who want refinement, space and everyday usability with a dash of Audi charisma.

details
A203044_overfull
A203047_overfull
A203051_overfull
A203054_overfull
A203068_overfull
A203069_overfull
A203075_overfull

Reviews Audi Q5

4.4 (5 Reviews)
rate
Aurelio
16 Mar 2026, 20:10:09

BYD — to Romania, in my area I have to recharge 5 times.
Audi Q5 — to the same place I refuel only 2 times.
At the end of the merry-go-round, if diesel doesn’t rise again, I can say I travel with peace of mind in the Audi — both on price and comfort 😆😆😆. If I switch on the air conditioning in the BYD, I’m totally screwed; for 1,350 km I’d need solar panels just to keep costs down.
But if I only drive around the city and do short runs, all praise to BYD.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Klaus
9 Dec 2025, 16:03:21

The Audi Q5 reliably gets me to my destination every day. It isn't cheap, but it's a real looker!!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi A4 Avant
Audi Q5
VS
In the comparison between the Audi A4 Avant and the Audi Q5, both models offer a blend of luxury and performance, catering to different lifestyle needs. The A4 Avant shines with its sleek, wagon body style that promises a spacious interior and an agile driving experience, perfect for city commuting …
Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 remains the comfortable, all‑round workhorse — traditional petrol, diesel and mild‑hybrid engines give familiar range, agreeable handling and a practical boot for family life. The Audi Q6 e‑tron, meanwhile, catapults you into Audi’s electric future with sleek looks, a tech‑packed cabin …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q5
VS
In the world of premium SUVs, the Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q5 stand out with their unique offerings. While the Q5 excels with its proven versatility and dynamic performance, the Q4 e-tron makes a compelling case with its electric efficiency and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Audi Q5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Audi Q5 prowls the compact-luxury segment with silky engines, a refined cabin and tech that makes every commute feel a size class upscale — it’s for buyers who want polish and badge appeal. The Skoda Kodiaq, bigger and far more practical, stuffs in three rows, acres of boot space and a sensible …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Audi Q5
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
46,400 - 79,600 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
92 - 100 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
56 - 189 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,910 - 2,245 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
433 - 520 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,900 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 565 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q5 have?

The Audi Q5 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.