VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or MG HS?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs MG HS: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space

MG HS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG HS is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,437 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers substantially more range – reaching up to 656 km, about 556 km more than the MG HS.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers considerably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 218 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the MG HS takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 505 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is markedly lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 465 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers barely more boot space – 526 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries markedly more – 540 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.6 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 529 - 656 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …
BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Fresh from BYD’s EV revolution, the sleek Seal U brings range, tech and bold styling to spar with the MG HS/EHS — MG’s faithful family crossover offered as a petrol and a plug‑in hybrid that plays the safe, sensible card. Which one gives you the best mix of space, running costs and grin‑per‑mile?
Audi Q6 e-tron
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.

details
A242848_medium
A242855_medium
A244272_medium

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:29:37

A slightly inflated price relative to the equipment included in this car.

Bula
11 Oct 2025, 08:59:08

Comfortable, but feels a bit firmer (over small bumps) than the Q5. You can tell the car has some heft!! The electric power — 388 PS / 285 kW BEV — is incredible. The battery drops pretty quickly if you push the beast a little. The advertised 600 km range is generous on paper; expect more like 500, or even 450 in winter. The onboard technology is surprising and pushed to the extreme. After trying it, it's hard to go back to a non-electric model.

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
Kia Sportage
MG HS
VS
Two likeable compact crossovers go head-to-head: the well-rounded Kia Sportage versus the value-packed MG HS and its electrified twin, the EHS. Which wins on everyday practicality, kit and style — and which one is the clever buy for your driveway and wallet?
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG HS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 remains the comfortable, all‑round workhorse — traditional petrol, diesel and mild‑hybrid engines give familiar range, agreeable handling and a practical boot for family life. The Audi Q6 e‑tron, meanwhile, catapults you into Audi’s electric future with sleek looks, a tech‑packed cabin …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron is a tech-drenched grand tourer with a hushed cabin and long-range ambitions, while the BMW iX3 is a down-to-earth EV that favours agility, efficiency and sensible value. If you crave futuristic luxury and motorway composure, go Q6 e-tron; if you want sharper handling, everyday …
Nissan Qashqai
MG HS
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and MG HS compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Dacia Duster
MG HS
VS
The Dacia Duster and MG HS compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi Q6 e-tron
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
529 - 656 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
507 L
Length
4,771 mm
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,665 - 1,685 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,361 - 1,529 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the Audi Q6 e-tron?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.