VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Polestar 4 comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 544 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 53,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Polestar 4?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Polestar 4: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

Polestar 4

4.8 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q6 e-tron

The electric SUV segment is heating up with two powerful contenders: the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Polestar 4. Both vehicles embody the transition towards sustainable mobility, yet they offer different approaches to performance, technology, and design. This article will compare the technical aspects and innovations of these exciting models, helping potential buyers make an informed choice.

4

Powertrain and Performance

The Audi Q6 e-tron comes equipped with a range of powerful electric motors, offering configurations with power outputs ranging from 292 to an exhilarating 516 HP, depending on the model variant. This translates to impressive acceleration figures, with the quickest versions capable of sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.3 seconds. The Q6 e-tron is available in both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, providing flexibility according to the driver's needs.

On the other hand, the Polestar 4 takes performance to a new level with a top variant that delivers an impressive 544 HP. With an acceleration of 0 to 100 km/h in just 3.8 seconds, the Polestar 4 is designed for those who crave instant power and agility. It, too, features all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive setups, appealing to a diverse range of driving preferences.

Q6 e-tron

Efficiency and Range

When it comes to electric range and efficiency, both vehicles hold their own. The Audi Q6 e-tron boasts a remarkable range of up to 637 km, depending on the battery configuration and driving style. Its battery capacities range from 75.8 kWh to 94.9 kWh, providing efficiency ratings around 15.6 to 18.9 kWh/100km.

The Polestar 4 also impresses with its range of up to 620 km, leveraging a 94 kWh battery. Its energy consumption rates approximate 17.8 to 18.7 kWh/100km. While the Q6 e-tron edges out in terms of maximum range, the Polestar 4 delivers solid efficiency that aligns with its performance-oriented attitude.

4

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the Audi Q6 e-tron measures 4771 mm in length, while the Polestar 4 is slightly longer at 4840 mm. Despite the size difference, both models offer ample trunk capacity, with the Q6 e-tron providing up to 526 liters and the Polestar 4 matching that capacity. With five seats available in both vehicles, families and drivers alike can enjoy generous space and comfort.

However, the Q6 e-tron stands taller at 1685 mm compared to the Polestar 4’s height of 1534 mm, potentially offering a more commanding driving position and better visibility on the road.

Q6 e-tron

Technological Innovations

Both Audi and Polestar pack their vehicles with cutting-edge technology and innovative features. The Q6 e-tron showcases Audi's latest MMI infotainment system, which delivers seamless connectivity and an intuitive user interface. The integration of advanced driver-assistance systems enhances safety and convenience, making each drive both enjoyable and secure.

The Polestar 4, on the other hand, emphasizes a minimalist yet high-tech interior, featuring a large central touchscreen that runs on Google’s Android Automotive OS. This integration not only simplifies navigation and media controls but also allows for easy access to Google Assistant, Google Maps, and a wide range of apps directly through the vehicle’s interface.

4

Conclusion: Choosing Your Electric SUV

In summary, the Audi Q6 e-tron and Polestar 4 are impressive additions to the electric SUV market, each catering to different customer needs. The Q6 e-tron excels in providing a superior range and a luxurious driving experience, while the Polestar 4 focuses on performance and innovative digital technology.

Ultimately, the choice between these two electric SUVs will depend on your personal preferences in terms of performance, technology, and practicality. Both vehicles are paving the way for a sustainable future in automotive design, offering drivers the opportunity to embrace electric mobility without compromising on performance or comfort.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Polestar 4 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 53,100 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,371 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q6 e-tron is slightly more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Polestar 4. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers marginally more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 48 km more than the Polestar 4.

4

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 offers only slightly more power – delivering 544 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Audi Q6 e-tron takes 4.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers slightly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 686 Nm. That’s about 169 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,200 kg compared to 2,230 kg. The difference is around 30 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 526 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries somewhat more – 540 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
Audi Q6 e-tron
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
53,100 - 59,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
2,230 - 2,355 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
526 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
2,008 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
455 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Polestar
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.