Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 69800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Volvo XC90?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Audi Q6 e-tron has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 54400 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15334 £.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs convincingly better – achieving up to 656 km, about 585 km more than the Volvo XC90.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron has a barely noticeable edge – offering 490 HP compared to 455 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Volvo XC90 takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls a bit stronger with 855 Nm compared to 709 Nm. That’s about 146 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Volvo XC90 is slight lighter – 2080 kg compared to 2200 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers convincingly more room – 526 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 224 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC90 performs a bit better – up to 1856 L, which is about 327 L more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 distinct takes the win – 710 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 170 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £54,400
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
Volvo XC90
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.