VS

BMW 4 Series Convertible vs Jeep Avenger comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (52,600 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 4 Series Convertible or Jeep Avenger?

BMW 4 Series Convertible vs Jeep Avenger: Key differences

BMW 4 Series Convertible

  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

4 Series Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Jeep Avenger is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the BMW 4 Series Convertible costs 52,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the BMW 4 Series Convertible with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Avenger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 4 Series Convertible offers significantly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 374 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 4 Series Convertible is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 4 Series Convertible delivers considerably more torque with 700 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm more.

4 Series Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Jeep Avenger offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is clearly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,765 kg. The difference is around 585 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW 4 Series Convertible offers only slightly more boot space – 385 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries moderately more – 502 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 4 Series Convertible is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £52,600
4 Series Convertible

BMW 4 Series Convertible

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 530 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 10.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
BMW 4 Series Convertible
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW 4 Series Convertible

The BMW 4 Series Convertible blends coupe-like elegance with open-top drama, its sleek profile and distinctive grille demanding attention whether the roof’s up or down. Behind the wheel it serves up taut handling and a refined ride, making it a rewarding choice for drivers who want sporty character without sacrificing everyday comfort — and yes, it looks spectacular when you drop the top.

details
P90400407_highRes_the-all-new-bmw-4-se
P90400400_highRes_the-all-new-bmw-4-se
P90400423_highRes_the-all-new-bmw-4-se
P90414434_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-con
P90133563_highRes_the-new-bmw-4-series

Reviews BMW 4 Series Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
Feedback tends to portray the Avenger as an attractive, city-friendly small SUV with smooth, efficient powertrains and generally agile urban manners. Owners often praise its fuel economy, responsive automatic gearing and pleasant driving feel, while typical negatives frequently mention inconsistent fit-and-finish, recurring electronic/display glitches and relatively narrow seats or limited cabin space. Opinions are somewhat mixed — several owners report trouble-free mechanical use, so buyers should weigh the appealing driving characteristics against the reported quality and electronics concerns.
Kurt
2 Jul 2026, 03:11:44

Ideal size — used only as a 2-seater.
Price acceptable —
Parking and handling — senior-friendly — controls also without touchscreen — buttons and knobs

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The all‑electric Jeep Avenger packs Jeep’s chunky styling into a city‑friendly crossover with brisk EV torque and cheeky off‑road looks — perfect for buyers who want electric motoring with attitude, even if it’s more boulevard than boulder. The Toyota Yaris Cross, meanwhile, swaps glamour for …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
BMW 4 Series Convertible
Mercedes CLE Convertible
VS
The BMW 4 Series Convertible and the Mercedes CLE Convertible go head-to-head as premium drop-top coupes, with the BMW known for taut, driver-focused handling and the CLE leaning into comfort, style, and advanced tech. Choose the 4 Series for a sharper, more engaging drive; opt for the CLE if you …
Jeep Avenger
MG ZS
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the MG ZS both aim at buyers wanting a small, practical SUV but take very different approaches. The Avenger is a compact, city-friendly Jeep with an electric drivetrain and rugged styling, while the MG ZS is a budget-focused small SUV offering spacious practicality and a choice …
Fiat 600
Jeep Avenger
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Jeep Avenger comes down to whether you prefer a compact, city-focused car with Italian flair or a small crossover that offers higher ground clearance and a more rugged image. This comparison will look at space, efficiency, driving feel, safety and running costs …
Jeep Avenger
VW Taigo
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the VW Taigo are compact crossovers aimed at city buyers who want SUV style without a bulky footprint. This comparison helps you weigh the Avenger’s rugged brand identity and practical versatility against the Taigo’s sleek styling and refined driving manners to find the better …
Jeep Avenger
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its rugged styling and off-road capabilities, appealing to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross offers a more refined approach with its sleek design and practical interior, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
BMW 4 Series Convertible
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
Price
52,600 - 97,800 £
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 10.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
136 - 231 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,765 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Trunk capacity
385 L
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,852 - 1,887 mm
Width
1,776 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
345 - 420 kg
Payload
490 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 530 HP
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 8.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 700 Nm
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
135 - 390 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
BMW
Brand
Jeep
What drive types are available for the BMW 4 Series Convertible?

The BMW 4 Series Convertible is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.