VS

BMW i4 vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (601 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (49,900 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW i4 or MG ZS?

BMW i4 vs MG ZS: Key differences

BMW i4

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

i4

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the BMW i4 costs 49,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,894 £.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW i4 offers significantly more power – delivering 601 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 404 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW i4 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW i4 delivers considerably more torque with 795 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 647 Nm more.

i4

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is considerably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 740 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW i4 offers only slightly more boot space – 470 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 27 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW i4 carries marginally more – 480 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW i4 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,900
i4

BMW i4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 286 - 601 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.7 - 16.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 514 - 613 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
BMW i4
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW i4

The BMW i4 arrives with the poise of a classic Gran Coupé, marrying BMW's playful handling with a sleek, modern interior that makes switching to electric feel like an upgrade rather than a compromise. For buyers who want a practical daily driver that still enjoys a spirited back-road run, the i4 quietly delivers smiles and a surprising dose of driver engagement.

details
P90439358_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90439356_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90439360_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90439369_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90422904_highRes_bmw-i4-interieur-6-2

Reviews BMW i4

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
Marco
23 Apr 2026, 14:56:19

Amazing car with enormous torque, equipment and driving experience, at an acceptable fuel consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the MG ZS are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling in a city-friendly package. The Kona leans toward sharper handling and a more refined drive, while the ZS competes on value and generous equipment—so your priorities for driving feel, features and budget will …
MG ZS
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Peugeot 2008 helps you weigh a value-focused, roomy compact SUV against a more stylish, composed rival with sharper handling and premium touches. This short guide highlights differences in space, equipment, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
MG ZS
Opel Frontera
VS
The MG ZS and Opel Frontera make very different promises: the ZS is a modern, budget-friendly compact SUV focused on efficiency and daily comfort, while the Frontera is a more traditional, rugged SUV aimed at tougher terrain and towing. Below I’ll compare them across space, driving dynamics, …
BMW i4
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW i4 is a sporty electric Gran Coupé focused on engaging driving dynamics and a sleek, fastback profile, while the BMW iX3 is a practical electric compact SUV that emphasizes comfort, interior space and everyday usability. Pick the i4 if you value sharper handling and coupe-like styling; …
Kia Niro
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Niro and MG ZS are compact crossovers that both promise practical space and everyday usability, but they take different routes — the Niro leans on efficiency, refinement and proven hybrid/electric technology, while the ZS competes on sharp pricing and generous equipment. If you prioritise …
BMW i4
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,900 - 63,200 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
514 - 613 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,285 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
470 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,852 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
445 - 480 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 601 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
400 - 795 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
210 - 442 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
BMW
Brand
MG
Is the BMW i4 offered with different drivetrains?

The BMW i4 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.