Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW iX3 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (469 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (59100 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Skoda Enyaq?
iX3
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 59100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21000 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the BMW iX3 with 15.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the BMW iX3 performs distinct better – achieving up to 805 km, about 218 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 has a distinct edge – offering 469 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX3 performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls slight stronger with 679 Nm compared to 645 Nm. That’s about 34 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
iX3
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is slightly lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2360 kg. The difference is around 358 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more room – 585 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX3 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1750 L, which is about 40 L more than the Skoda Enyaq.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 509 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW iX3 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
BMW iX3
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £59,100
BMW iX3
BMW iX3
5 (1 Reviews)
The BMW iX3 brings BMW's familiar SUV poise into the electric era, blending restrained styling and a comfortable, composed ride that will please traditionalists dipping their toes into electrification. It's quiet, practical and rather grown-up about going electric — a sensible choice for buyers who want BMW driving manners without the drama.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BMW iX3
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
59100 - 64600 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.10 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
805 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2360 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4782 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1895 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1635 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1750 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
465 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
469 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
645 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
345 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the BMW iX3?
The BMW iX3 is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.