VS

BMW iX3 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (469 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (54,300 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Skoda Enyaq?

BMW iX3 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

BMW iX3

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

iX3

The Battle of Electrified Titans: BMW iX3 vs. Skoda Enyaq

As the automotive industry pivots towards a more sustainable future, the proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) has given rise to some formidable contenders in the market. Two such rivals in the all-electric SUV segment are the BMW iX3 and the Skoda Enyaq. Both cars represent the state-of-the-art in EV engineering, but they cater to slightly different priorities among electric car enthusiasts. Join us as we dive into the details of these electrified marvels.

Enyaq

Power and Performance: Beyond Just Numbers

The BMW iX3 offers a mono variant propelled by a robust 210 kW (286 HP) electric motor, channeling power through a sophisticated rear-wheel-drive system. It clocks 0-100 km/h in just about 6.8 seconds, achieving a top speed of 180 km/h. This powertrain ensures that drivers experience a crisp and engaging ride, with 400 Nm of torque instantaneously available for that exhilarating push.

In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq provides a more diverse lineup, catering to varied preferences by offering RWD and AWD versions, with power outputs ranging from 150 kW (204 HP) to a sprightly 250 kW (340 HP). The acceleration figures vary accordingly, with the quickest model sprinting from 0-100 km/h in 5.5 seconds, and top speeds reaching either 160 or 180 km/h. This flexibility allows the Enyaq to cater to a wide array of driving styles and needs.

iX3

Range and Efficiency: Traveling the Extra Mile

Electric range is a crucial factor in the adoption of EVs. The BMW iX3 boasts an impressive electric range of 471 km, positioning itself as a reliable long-range option. Its consumption figures stand at 17.6 kWh/100 km, highlighting a commendable balance between performance and efficiency.

The Skoda Enyaq, on the other hand, stretches the limits with the potential to deliver a remarkable range of up to 587 km in its most efficient form, with consumption figures as low as 14.6 kWh/100 km. This astounding efficiency can be attributed to Skoda's meticulous optimization in aerodynamics and weight management.

Enyaq

Design and Space: Comfort Meets Practicality

Stylistically, both vehicles embrace the contemporary SUV form, but with distinct branding cues. The BMW iX3 strikes a robust road presence with its 4734 mm length, 1891 mm width, and height of 1668 mm, paired with a generous trunk capacity of 510 liters, making it suitable for family adventures and city cruising alike.

The Skoda Enyaq, slightly more compact with lengths varying slightly up to 4658 mm, compensates with an excellent trunk capacity of up to 585 liters, infusing practicality without compromising on roominess, thereby appealing to those who prioritize cargo space.

iX3

Conclusion: Which SUV Suits Your Lifestyle?

Deciding between the BMW iX3 and the Skoda Enyaq ultimately depends on personal preference and priorities. Enthusiasts favoring driving dynamics and BMW's premium badge might lean towards the iX3. Meanwhile, those seeking versatility, extensive range options, and a touch of family-oriented practicality may find the Enyaq more aligned with their desires.

Whichever path you choose, both the BMW iX3 and Skoda Enyaq symbolize the dawn of a new green era in automotive engineering, harmonizing performance, efficiency, and innovation in the EV landscape.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

iX3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 54,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,428 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BMW iX3 is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW iX3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 805 km, about 218 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 469 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 645 Nm. That’s about 34 Nm more.

iX3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is marginally lighter – 2,179 kg compared to 2,360 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 489 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW iX3 stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,300
iX3

BMW iX3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 320 - 469 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 635 - 805 km
details
BMW iX3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 brings BMW's familiar SUV poise into the electric era, blending restrained styling and a comfortable, composed ride that will please traditionalists dipping their toes into electrification. It's quiet, practical and rather grown-up about going electric — a sensible choice for buyers who want BMW driving manners without the drama.

details
P90626536_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626665_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626573_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626566_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x

Reviews BMW iX3

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Johan
20 Sept 2025, 16:15:37

Nice range, fast charging and… bidirectional charging!!

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
BMW iX2
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW iX2 and BMW iX3 go head-to-head in the compact electric-SUV ring, one flirting with city sportiness while the other favours long-distance composure. Pick the iX2 for cheeky handling and urban style, or the iX3 when range, space and relaxed motorway manners matter — either way, you get that …
BMW iX3
Mercedes GLB
VS
The BMW iX3 and Mercedes GLB go head-to-head as two very different takes on the premium compact SUV: the iX3 is BMW’s electric, efficiency-focused offering while the GLB is Mercedes’ practical, multi‑seat family SUV. This comparison will help you weigh the iX3’s EV range, refinement and tech …
BMW iX3
BMW X5
VS
Meet the BMW iX3 and the BMW X5: the iX3 is BMW’s quietly efficient all-electric mid-size SUV, while the X5 is the brand’s imposing, go-anywhere luxury SUV with traditional petrol and diesel power. Choosing between them is simple — a city-smart, lower-cost, instant-torque electric every day, or a …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron is a tech-drenched grand tourer with a hushed cabin and long-range ambitions, while the BMW iX3 is a down-to-earth EV that favours agility, efficiency and sensible value. If you crave futuristic luxury and motorway composure, go Q6 e-tron; if you want sharper handling, everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
BMW iX3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
54,300 - 66,300 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
635 - 805 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,360 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,895 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
465 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
320 - 469 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 645 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
235 - 345 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the BMW iX3?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.