VS

BMW iX3 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (469 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (59100 £ vs 41900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Skoda Enyaq?

iX3

The Battle of Electrified Titans: BMW iX3 vs. Skoda Enyaq

As the automotive industry pivots towards a more sustainable future, the proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) has given rise to some formidable contenders in the market. Two such rivals in the all-electric SUV segment are the BMW iX3 and the Skoda Enyaq. Both cars represent the state-of-the-art in EV engineering, but they cater to slightly different priorities among electric car enthusiasts. Join us as we dive into the details of these electrified marvels.

Enyaq

Power and Performance: Beyond Just Numbers

The BMW iX3 offers a mono variant propelled by a robust 210 kW (286 HP) electric motor, channeling power through a sophisticated rear-wheel-drive system. It clocks 0-100 km/h in just about 6.8 seconds, achieving a top speed of 180 km/h. This powertrain ensures that drivers experience a crisp and engaging ride, with 400 Nm of torque instantaneously available for that exhilarating push.

In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq provides a more diverse lineup, catering to varied preferences by offering RWD and AWD versions, with power outputs ranging from 150 kW (204 HP) to a sprightly 250 kW (340 HP). The acceleration figures vary accordingly, with the quickest model sprinting from 0-100 km/h in 5.5 seconds, and top speeds reaching either 160 or 180 km/h. This flexibility allows the Enyaq to cater to a wide array of driving styles and needs.

iX3

Range and Efficiency: Traveling the Extra Mile

Electric range is a crucial factor in the adoption of EVs. The BMW iX3 boasts an impressive electric range of 471 km, positioning itself as a reliable long-range option. Its consumption figures stand at 17.6 kWh/100 km, highlighting a commendable balance between performance and efficiency.

The Skoda Enyaq, on the other hand, stretches the limits with the potential to deliver a remarkable range of up to 587 km in its most efficient form, with consumption figures as low as 14.6 kWh/100 km. This astounding efficiency can be attributed to Skoda's meticulous optimization in aerodynamics and weight management.

Enyaq

Design and Space: Comfort Meets Practicality

Stylistically, both vehicles embrace the contemporary SUV form, but with distinct branding cues. The BMW iX3 strikes a robust road presence with its 4734 mm length, 1891 mm width, and height of 1668 mm, paired with a generous trunk capacity of 510 liters, making it suitable for family adventures and city cruising alike.

The Skoda Enyaq, slightly more compact with lengths varying slightly up to 4658 mm, compensates with an excellent trunk capacity of up to 585 liters, infusing practicality without compromising on roominess, thereby appealing to those who prioritize cargo space.

iX3

Conclusion: Which SUV Suits Your Lifestyle?

Deciding between the BMW iX3 and the Skoda Enyaq ultimately depends on personal preference and priorities. Enthusiasts favoring driving dynamics and BMW's premium badge might lean towards the iX3. Meanwhile, those seeking versatility, extensive range options, and a touch of family-oriented practicality may find the Enyaq more aligned with their desires.

Whichever path you choose, both the BMW iX3 and Skoda Enyaq symbolize the dawn of a new green era in automotive engineering, harmonizing performance, efficiency, and innovation in the EV landscape.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

BMW iX3 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

BMW iX3

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • distinct more power
  • distinct more electric range
  • to a small extent quicker from 0–100 km/h

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • minimal more efficient
  • minimal lighter
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 59100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17143 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the BMW iX3 with 15.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.

As for electric range, the BMW iX3 performs distinct better – achieving up to 805 km, about 218 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

iX3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 has a distinct edge – offering 469 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW iX3 performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls slight stronger with 679 Nm compared to 645 Nm. That’s about 34 Nm difference.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is minimal lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2360 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more room – 585 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX3 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1750 L, which is about 40 L more than the Skoda Enyaq.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 489 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW iX3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

BMW iX3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £59,100
iX3

BMW iX3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 469 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.10 kWh
  • Electric Range : 805 km

BMW iX3

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate

The BMW iX3 brings BMW's familiar SUV poise into the electric era, blending restrained styling and a comfortable, composed ride that will please traditionalists dipping their toes into electrification. It's quiet, practical and rather grown-up about going electric — a sensible choice for buyers who want BMW driving manners without the drama.

details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
BMW iX3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
59100 - 64600 £
Price
41900 - 52200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.10 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Electric Range
805 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
108.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2360 kg
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
Trunk capacity
520 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4782 mm
Length
4658 mm
Width
1895 mm
Width
1879 mm
Height
1635 mm
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
Max trunk capacity
1750 L
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Payload
465 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
469 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
210 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
645 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
345 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the BMW iX3?

The BMW iX3 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.