VS

BMW iX3 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (469 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (60,800 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Skoda Kodiaq?

BMW iX3 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

BMW iX3

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

iX3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 60,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,894 £.

As for electric range, the BMW iX3 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 805 km, about 683 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 offers clearly more power – delivering 469 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW iX3 delivers visibly more torque with 645 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 245 Nm more.

iX3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,360 kg. The difference is around 676 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries moderately more – 563 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 98 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW iX3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £60,800
iX3

BMW iX3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 469 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 805 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX3
Porsche Macan
VS
Silent electric refinement meets petrol-fired passion: the BMW iX3 brings BMW’s EV polish and efficiency to the compact-SUV table, while the Porsche Macan remains the benchmark for engaging, analogue driving dynamics. We’ll cut through the spec sheets and showroom gloss to help you decide whether …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
BMW iX3
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 brings BMW's familiar SUV poise into the electric era, blending restrained styling and a comfortable, composed ride that will please traditionalists dipping their toes into electrification. It's quiet, practical and rather grown-up about going electric — a sensible choice for buyers who want BMW driving manners without the drama.

details
P90626536_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626665_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626573_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626566_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x

Reviews BMW iX3

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Johan
20 Sept 2025, 16:15:37

Nice range, fast charging and… bidirectional charging!!

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX2
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW iX2 and BMW iX3 go head-to-head in the compact electric-SUV ring, one flirting with city sportiness while the other favours long-distance composure. Pick the iX2 for cheeky handling and urban style, or the iX3 when range, space and relaxed motorway manners matter — either way, you get that …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
BMW iX3
BMW X5
VS
Meet the BMW iX3 and the BMW X5: the iX3 is BMW’s quietly efficient all-electric mid-size SUV, while the X5 is the brand’s imposing, go-anywhere luxury SUV with traditional petrol and diesel power. Choosing between them is simple — a city-smart, lower-cost, instant-torque electric every day, or a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
BMW iX3
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
60,800 - 66,300 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
805 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,360 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,895 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
465 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
469 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
645 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
345 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the BMW iX3?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.