Compare performance (326 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (38,700 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X1 or Skoda Elroq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and Skoda Elroq stand out as two formidable contenders, each bringing unique strengths and innovations. In this article, we will dissect their technical aspects, performance metrics, and innovations to uncover which vehicle might be the better choice for your lifestyle.
The BMW X1 boasts a sporty and aggressive stance with a length of 4500 mm, width of 1845 mm, and a height ranging from 1622 mm to 1642 mm, giving it a commanding presence on the road. In contrast, the Skoda Elroq is slightly shorter at 4488 mm but compensates with a wider body at 1884 mm and a consistent height of 1625 mm. The sleek lines and bold grille of the Elroq promise a futuristic touch, while the X1 maintains BMW's typical sporty elegance.
The BMW X1 offers a versatile range of engines, including diesel, petrol, diesel MHEV, petrol MHEV, and plug-in hybrid options. Power outputs range from 136 HP to a robust 300 HP, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.4 seconds, showcasing a performance-oriented choice for enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Skoda Elroq presents a purely electric drive with power options of 170 HP to 285 HP, achieving 0-100 km/h in an impressive 6.6 seconds for its most powerful variant.
BMW continues to innovate with the X1 by offering various advanced technologies, including an 83 km electric range for hybrid variants and state-of-the-art infotainment systems that seamlessly integrate with mobile devices. The range of intelligent driving assistance features enhances safety and convenience.
Similarly, the Skoda Elroq impresses with its commitment to sustainability and tech-forward solutions. It features a remarkable electric range of up to 580 km and comes equipped with an efficient reduction gearbox. Skoda's focus on driver-assistance technologies also offers comprehensive safety features ensuring a relaxed driving experience.
The X1, catering to luxury and comfort, offers advanced interior finishes and an impressive trunk capacity of up to 540 liters. The attention to detail and quality materials create a premium cabin experience for occupants.
In comparison, the Skoda Elroq offers a slightly smaller trunk space at 470 liters but compensates with a more functional and spacious interior layout. Both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers, making them suitable for families and long drives.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the BMW X1’s plug-in hybrid variant showcases superb efficiency with consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km. Traditional gasoline variants fall within 6.5 to 5.1 L/100km. In contrast, the Skoda Elroq's electric setup offers a consumption rate of 15.2 to 16.4 kWh/100km, aligning with eco-conscious driving habits while emitting zero CO2.
Both the BMW X1 and Skoda Elroq cater to different market segments and preferences. The X1 is designed for those seeking performance, luxury, and a sporty driving experience, while the Elroq appeals to environmentally conscious consumers looking for a reliable electric SUV with ample range and innovative features.
Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual priorities—whether you value spirited performance and traditional luxury or innovative electric technology that rides the wave of the future.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Elroq is visibly cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,609 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 493 km more than the BMW X1.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers very slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 326 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers noticeably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 477 Nm. That’s about 202 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is visibly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers moderately more boot space – 540 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries very slightly more – 549 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X1 delivers BMW's sporty driving character in a compact premium crossover package, making daily driving both engaging and practical. With a refined cabin, flexible cargo space and composed handling, it's a smart choice for buyers who want luxury and versatility without compromise.
details
The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,700 - 56,200 £
|
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Payload
482 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España