Compare performance (398 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (51,300 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Citroen C5 Aircross?
In today’s automotive market, the quest for a versatile, family-friendly SUV often brings prospective buyers to two impressive contenders: the BMW X3 and the Citroen C5 Aircross. While both vehicles cater to a similar audience, they bring different strengths and innovations to the table. Let's delve into a detailed comparison to see which might suit your needs better.
The BMW X3 offers an exhilarating drive with its wide range of engine options. The lineup includes diesel, petrol, mild-hybrid (MHEV), and plug-in hybrid powertrains. With power outputs ranging from 184 to 510 HP, the X3 promises an engaging driving experience. Its all-wheel-drive capability further enhances its prowess on various terrains, making it a great companion for any adventure.
In contrast, the Citroen C5 Aircross leans towards efficiency and practicality. Available with diesel, petrol MHEV, and plug-in hybrid engines, the C5 Aircross offers power outputs between 131 and 224 HP. The front-wheel-drive configuration supports a more straightforward, economical drive, perfect for urban jungles and highway cruises alike.
BMW's X3 delivers a consumption range from 0.9 L/100km for the plug-in hybrid variant to 10.8 L/100km for its more powerful petrol engines. With CO2 emissions starting at 21 g/km, the X3’s plug-in models are a clear choice for eco-conscious drivers seeking performance without guilt.
The Citroen C5 Aircross, meanwhile, shines in fuel efficiency with a consumption range from 1.4 L/100km for the plug-in hybrid to 5.6 L/100km for the MHEV variant. The vehicle’s CO2 emissions begin at a low 32 g/km, underlining its environmental credentials and making it a compelling choice for the eco-aware family.
Inside, the BMW X3 offers a sophisticated cabin, enriched with the latest technology and high-quality materials. Its trunk capacity ranges between 450 to 570 liters, ensuring ample storage for your journeys. The spacious interior comfortably seats five, combining luxury with practicality.
The Citroen C5 Aircross provides a cozy, innovative interior, wrapped in Citroen’s distinctive comfort-focused design philosophy. It boasts a slightly higher trunk capacity of 580 liters, indicating its edge in practicality. The thoughtful layout and unique suspension system further enhance its reputation as a comfort-centric family SUV.
The BMW X3 stands at 4708 to 4755 mm in length, 1891 to 1920 mm in width, and up to 1669 mm in height. Its robust build is complemented by a payload capacity reaching up to 585 kg, offering both strength and versatility.
The Citroen C5 Aircross is slightly more compact, with dimensions of 4500 mm in length and 1859 mm in width, and a height of 1688 mm. It achieves a payload capacity of up to 465 kg, aligning well with its practical, user-friendly design.
Both the BMW X3 and Citroen C5 Aircross offer unique strengths tailored to varying preferences. The X3 caters to those who value dynamic performance and premium sophistication, while the C5 Aircross stands out for its exemplary comfort, efficiency, and practicality. Ultimately, the choice boils down to the specific needs and lifestyle of the driver—whether you prioritize thrilling drives or efficient, comfortable commutes.双方车型 are consistent winners in the SUV segment, promising satisfaction whichever road you choose.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C5 Aircross is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,123 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C5 Aircross uses 2.5 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the BMW X3 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers substantially more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 432 km more than the BMW X3.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers considerably more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 173 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Citroen C5 Aircross takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers substantially more torque with 670 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C5 Aircross is a bit lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,930 kg. The difference is around 301 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X3 offers barely more boot space – 570 L compared to 565 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW X3 carries a bit more – 570 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.
The BMW X3 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.
details
The Citroën C5 Aircross feels like a sofa on wheels, delivering a calm, floaty ride and clever packaging that makes life with luggage and kids noticeably easier. Quirky French styling and a supremely practical, family-focused cabin mean it quietly wins hearts by prioritising comfort over showroom bravado.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51,300 - 72,400 £
|
Price
29,100 - 43,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
Electric Range
81 - 520 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
64 - 175 g/km
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 - 65 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 2,184 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
|
Trunk capacity
565 L
|
|
Length
4,755 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
|
Height
1,660 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
570 kg
|
Payload
446 - 471 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España