Compare performance (449 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Jeep Avenger?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape has never been more thrilling with the escalating competition among electric vehicles (EVs). Today, we're diving deep into a comparison between two noteworthy models: BYD Atto 3 and Jeep Avenger. Both vehicles cater to a similar audience with their SUV body types and electric powertrains but differ significantly in terms of technical prowess and innovations.
The BYD Atto 3 leads with an electric motor delivering 204 HP and 150 kW of power, boasting a torque of 310 Nm. It can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds, appealing to those who crave prompt responses and smooth driving experiences. This SUV also reaches a maximum speed of 160 km/h which ensures it handles both city and highway driving with competence.
In contrast, the Jeep Avenger offers a variety of engine types, including an electric motor option producing 156 HP and 115 kW of power with a torque output of 260 Nm. The Avenger's electric variant achieves 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 9 seconds and can attain a peak speed of 150 km/h, offering a slightly milder performance yet still efficient for everyday needs.
The BYD Atto 3 triumphs in terms of electric range, offering up to 420 km on a full charge with a consumption of 16 kWh/100km. This efficiency ensures longer drives without frequent charging stops, making it an ideal partner for long-distance travels.
Meanwhile, the Jeep Avenger electric variant provides a range of up to 400 km, with a slightly lower consumption rate of 15.4 kWh/100km. While it falls slightly short in range compared to the Atto 3, it compensates with its versatility of being available in other fuel engine configurations, catering to a broader spectrum of user needs.
Inside, the BYD Atto 3 is spacious, offering a trunk capacity of 440 liters and a payload of 335 kg. It accommodates five seats comfortably, ensuring ample room for passengers and cargo alike, perfect for family adventures.
The Jeep Avenger, slightly more compact with a trunk capacity ranging from 325 to 380 liters depending on the variant, provides a higher payload capacity of up to 502 kg. Although it offers less trunk space, its payload advantage might appeal to those requiring more hauling capability for personal or professional activities.
The BYD Atto 3 measures 4455 mm in length, 1875 mm in width, and 1615 mm in height, providing a robust road presence that's typical of an SUV. Its dimensions promote a spacious interior and ensure stability and confidence on the road.
The Jeep Avenger is compact, measuring between 4084 mm in length, 1776 mm in width, and height variations up to 1536 mm. Its compact nature enhances urban maneuverability, making it a compelling choice for city dwellers needing an efficient and versatile vehicle.
Both the BYD Atto 3 and Jeep Avenger showcase the evolution of electric mobility with their distinct offerings. For those prioritizing range, acceleration, and interior space, the Atto 3 stands out. However, the Avenger's flexibility with multiple powertrain options and higher payload might appeal to consumers seeking versatility and efficiency in different driving conditions.
Ultimately, the choice between these two electric SUVs will depend on individual preferences and lifestyle requirements, making both models exciting choices in the expanding electric vehicle market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Avenger is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,020 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 110 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers substantially more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 293 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers significantly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The BYD Atto 3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.
details
The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
|
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España