VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Renault Arkana?

BYD Atto 3 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4.1 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,105 £.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers considerably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 306 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers considerably more torque with 560 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 355 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is markedly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,880 kg. The difference is around 370 kg.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries somewhat more – 530 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Seal U shows two distinct approaches: the Atto 3 is a compact, comfort-oriented electric crossover focused on practicality and value, while the Seal U is a sleeker, performance-oriented fastback with sharper handling and longer-range options. This comparison …
BYD Atto 3
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
Marinos manolessos
21 Jun 2026, 19:22:18

More quicker better price better equipped rwd move

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4.1 (8 Reviews)
rate
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
Claude
19 Aug 2026, 22:32:22

The Arkana's lines are softer on the eye and sportier.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
16 Feb 2026, 10:35:42

I've been driving the Arkana for over a year. I'm satisfied. It has met my expectations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Radek
15 Feb 2026, 18:47:30

A very poor car mechanically — at 98,000 km the fuel pump failed; not even a year later and at 132,000 km the fuel pump failed again, and in the shop the gearbox broke. The car was out of warranty; Renault wanted 38,000 zł. Total junk — I don't recommend this Renault hybrid contraption to anyone.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Meet BYD's feisty duo: the Atto 3 — a cheeky, city-friendly compact crossover — takes on the Sealion 7, a sleeker, more spacious contender that aims to blend family practicality with a touch of flair. Which one wins your garage comes down to whether you crave nimble urban fun or roomy long-range …
BYD Atto 3
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and the Kia EV3? This head-to-head looks at real-world range, driving dynamics, interior space, equipment and ownership costs to help you pick the best compact electric SUV for your needs.
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and the MG MG5 EV take different approaches to electric motoring: the Atto 3 is a compact crossover that emphasizes tech, comfort and a modern cabin, while the MG MG5 EV is a practical electric estate focused on space and value. This comparison will help you choose between a stylish, …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the MG MGS6 EV helps buyers decide between BYD’s compact, tech-focused electric crossover and MG’s contender that prioritizes practicality and value. Below I’ll outline the key differences in range, performance, interior quality and equipment so you can pick the one …
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Kia Niro and Renault Arkana both offer distinct advantages. The Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid and electric options, catering to environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana captivates with …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Ford Explorer EV represent two different takes on the electric SUV — the Atto 3 is a compact, value-packed package while the Explorer EV aims at larger families with more range and performance. I’ll walk you through their real-world range, practicality, driving character and …
Kia Sportage
Renault Arkana
VS
The Kia Sportage and Renault Arkana compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BYD Atto 3
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
BYD
Brand
Renault
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.