VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

BYD Atto 3 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BYD Atto 3 is substantially cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 236,838 £.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 449 HP. That’s roughly 151 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers noticeably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is significantly lighter – 1,880 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 780 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers a bit more boot space – 555 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries markedly more – 840 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 310 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Atto 2 comes down to whether you need more range, space and performance or a smaller, more affordable city EV. The Atto 3 delivers stronger power, longer driving range and more interior room, while the Atto 2 focuses on compact dimensions, efficiency and …
BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Ford Explorer EV represent two different takes on the electric SUV — the Atto 3 is a compact, value-packed package while the Explorer EV aims at larger families with more range and performance. I’ll walk you through their real-world range, practicality, driving character and …
BYD Atto 3
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Seal U shows two distinct approaches: the Atto 3 is a compact, comfort-oriented electric crossover focused on practicality and value, while the Seal U is a sleeker, performance-oriented fastback with sharper handling and longer-range options. This comparison …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and the MG MG5 EV take different approaches to electric motoring: the Atto 3 is a compact crossover that emphasizes tech, comfort and a modern cabin, while the MG MG5 EV is a practical electric estate focused on space and value. This comparison will help you choose between a stylish, …
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Skoda Elroq brings together a tech-forward Chinese electric crossover and a more traditionally engineered European compact SUV. I’ll highlight the key differences in driving range, interior space, features and running costs so you can quickly see which one fits your …
BYD Atto 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Toyota C‑HR pits an all-electric, tech-focused compact against Toyota’s familiar crossover offering, so it’s really a choice between EV practicality and proven petrol/hybrid versatility. Think about daily range and charging convenience if you lean toward the Atto 3, …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the MG MGS6 EV helps buyers decide between BYD’s compact, tech-focused electric crossover and MG’s contender that prioritizes practicality and value. Below I’ll outline the key differences in range, performance, interior quality and equipment so you can pick the one …
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
The Rolls-Royce Cullinan and the Rolls-Royce Phantom are two expressions of ultimate luxury: the Cullinan delivers SUV practicality and a commanding presence with genuine off‑road ability, while the Phantom is the definitive full‑size saloon built around serene, chauffeur‑focused comfort and …
BYD Atto 3
Hyundai Kona
VS
BYD Atto 3 and Hyundai Kona go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Atto 3 or the Hyundai …
BYD Atto 3
XPeng G6
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the XPeng G6 helps you decide between a compact, value-oriented electric crossover and a more tech-focused, aerodynamic SUV with stronger range and advanced driver aids. I’ll highlight how they differ in range, interior comfort, driving character and ownership costs so …
BYD Atto 3
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
BYD
Brand
Rolls-Royce
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.