Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Atto 3 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (204 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33400 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Skoda Enyaq?
Atto 3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
BYD Atto 3 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4637 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the BYD Atto 3 with 16 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – achieving up to 587 km, about 167 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Enyaq performs somewhat better – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls convincingly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Atto 3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1825 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 177 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers evident more room – 585 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 145 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs distinct better – up to 1710 L, which is about 372 L more than the BYD Atto 3.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq noticeable takes the win – 509 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 174 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 3
5 (1 Reviews)
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 35100 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
420 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1825 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4455 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1875 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1615 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.30 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.