VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Skoda Enyaq?

BYD Atto 3 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BYD Atto 3 is markedly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,494 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 1.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 77 km more than the BYD Atto 3.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers markedly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers moderately more torque with 679 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 119 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is slightly lighter – 1,825 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 354 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 145 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries clearly more – 489 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 154 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 420 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
In the battle of BYD's innovative electric vehicles, the Atto 3 emerges as a more advanced contender compared to the Atto 2. With its sleek design, improved range, and enhanced technology features, the Atto 3 not only offers better performance but also caters to the growing demand for eco-friendly …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
If you want a friendly, practical EV that looks like it drinks coffee in a hipster cafe and carries everything from groceries to weekend bikes, the BYD Atto 3 is the sensible, value-packed choice. The BYD Seal U, by contrast, dresses up the electric experience with sleeker lines, sharper handling …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Meet BYD's feisty duo: the Atto 3 — a cheeky, city-friendly compact crossover — takes on the Sealion 7, a sleeker, more spacious contender that aims to blend family practicality with a touch of flair. Which one wins your garage comes down to whether you crave nimble urban fun or roomy long-range …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq present a compelling match-up in the growing electric SUV market, each offering an impressive blend of performance and versatility. While the Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and a robust powertrain, the Enyaq stands out with its strong emphasis on …
BYD Atto 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Toyota C-HR+ compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,825 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4,455 mm
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
1,615 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
335 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
Skoda
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.