Two cars, one duel: BYD Atto 3 meets Tesla Model 3.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the rapidly evolving automotive landscape, electric vehicles (EVs) are taking center stage. Two competitors in this arena, the BYD Atto 3 and the Tesla Model 3, are drawing attention for their innovative approaches and technical prowess. Here's a comprehensive comparison of these two electrifying giants.
The BYD Atto 3 presents itself as a compact SUV, boasting a length of 4455 mm, a width of 1875 mm, and a height of 1615 mm. Its design appeals to those who prefer the elevated driving position and space of an SUV. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3, a sleek hatchback, is slightly longer at 4720 mm and offers a more streamlined profile, with a height of 1440–1441 mm. This design choice highlights Tesla's focus on aerodynamics with a low-slung body that appeals to modern minimalism enthusiasts.
Both vehicles are powered entirely by electric engines, contributing no direct CO2 emissions to the environment. The BYD Atto 3 features a front-wheel-drive system with a power output of 204 HP and a torque of 310 Nm, achieving a 0-100 km/h acceleration in 7.3 seconds and a top speed of 160 km/h. Meanwhile, the Tesla Model 3, available in multiple variants including rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, delivers impressive horsepower ranging from 283 to 460 HP and torque between 420 and 723 Nm. Its most potent variant accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in just 3.1 seconds and reaches a formidable top speed of up to 262 km/h.
Efficiency stands as the cornerstone for electric vehicles. The BYD Atto 3 showcases a consumption rate of 16 kWh per 100 km, allowing it to cover an electric range of up to 420 km. Tesla's Model 3, however, takes the lead with its extended range capabilities, offering variants that can travel between 513 and a remarkable 702 km on a single charge. Its energy consumption varies across models, with figures as low as 12.5 kWh per 100 km for the most efficient configuration.
Comfortably seating five, both the BYD Atto 3 and Tesla Model 3 cater to families and daily commuters. The Atto 3 provides a trunk capacity of 440 liters, whereas the Model 3 offers a more generous 594 liters, making it more favorable for those who require ample storage space. Coupled with innovations like Tesla's modern minimalist interior design and BYD's focus on user-friendly controls, each vehicle provides a unique approach to passenger comfort and convenience.
The innovation doesn't cease at powertrains. The Tesla Model 3 is known for its cutting-edge technology, such as its Autopilot system, over-the-air software updates, and a large infotainment screen that dominates the dashboard. BYD, not to be outdone, delivers contemporary technology features, ensuring connectivity and ease of use but focuses heavily on providing value through practicality and affordability.
The BYD Atto 3 and Tesla Model 3 each offer compelling reasons to be considered for your next EV purchase. The Atto 3 shines as a practical, efficient SUV option for those who prioritize balance and value, whereas the Model 3 positions itself as a leader in range, performance, and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on an individual's specific needs and preferences in the growing electric vehicle market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BYD Atto 3 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33400 £, while the Tesla Model 3 costs 34300 £. That’s a price difference of around 857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the BYD Atto 3 with 16 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.80 kWh.
As for range, the Tesla Model 3 performs clearly better – achieving up to 750 km, about 330 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a convincingly edge – offering 460 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 256 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 7.30 s. That’s about 4.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs evident better – reaching 262 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 102 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model 3 pulls significantly stronger with 660 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1822 kg compared to 1825 kg. The difference is around 3 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers noticeable more room – 594 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 154 L.
When it comes to payload, BYD Atto 3 barely noticeable takes the win – 335 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.
The Tesla Model 3 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Tesla Model 3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Tesla, Inc.
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
|
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
|
@ Tesla, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 35100 £
|
Price
34300 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
420 km
|
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
4455 mm
|
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
|
|
Width
1875 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1615 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
303 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.30 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Tesla
|
The BYD Atto 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España