Compare performance (449 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 31,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Tesla Model 3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the rapidly evolving automotive landscape, electric vehicles (EVs) are taking center stage. Two competitors in this arena, the BYD Atto 3 and the Tesla Model 3, are drawing attention for their innovative approaches and technical prowess. Here's a comprehensive comparison of these two electrifying giants.
The BYD Atto 3 presents itself as a compact SUV, boasting a length of 4455 mm, a width of 1875 mm, and a height of 1615 mm. Its design appeals to those who prefer the elevated driving position and space of an SUV. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3, a sleek hatchback, is slightly longer at 4720 mm and offers a more streamlined profile, with a height of 1440–1441 mm. This design choice highlights Tesla's focus on aerodynamics with a low-slung body that appeals to modern minimalism enthusiasts.
Both vehicles are powered entirely by electric engines, contributing no direct CO2 emissions to the environment. The BYD Atto 3 features a front-wheel-drive system with a power output of 204 HP and a torque of 310 Nm, achieving a 0-100 km/h acceleration in 7.3 seconds and a top speed of 160 km/h. Meanwhile, the Tesla Model 3, available in multiple variants including rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, delivers impressive horsepower ranging from 283 to 460 HP and torque between 420 and 723 Nm. Its most potent variant accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in just 3.1 seconds and reaches a formidable top speed of up to 262 km/h.
Efficiency stands as the cornerstone for electric vehicles. The BYD Atto 3 showcases a consumption rate of 16 kWh per 100 km, allowing it to cover an electric range of up to 420 km. Tesla's Model 3, however, takes the lead with its extended range capabilities, offering variants that can travel between 513 and a remarkable 702 km on a single charge. Its energy consumption varies across models, with figures as low as 12.5 kWh per 100 km for the most efficient configuration.
Comfortably seating five, both the BYD Atto 3 and Tesla Model 3 cater to families and daily commuters. The Atto 3 provides a trunk capacity of 440 liters, whereas the Model 3 offers a more generous 594 liters, making it more favorable for those who require ample storage space. Coupled with innovations like Tesla's modern minimalist interior design and BYD's focus on user-friendly controls, each vehicle provides a unique approach to passenger comfort and convenience.
The innovation doesn't cease at powertrains. The Tesla Model 3 is known for its cutting-edge technology, such as its Autopilot system, over-the-air software updates, and a large infotainment screen that dominates the dashboard. BYD, not to be outdone, delivers contemporary technology features, ensuring connectivity and ease of use but focuses heavily on providing value through practicality and affordability.
The BYD Atto 3 and Tesla Model 3 each offer compelling reasons to be considered for your next EV purchase. The Atto 3 shines as a practical, efficient SUV option for those who prioritize balance and value, whereas the Model 3 positions itself as a leader in range, performance, and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on an individual's specific needs and preferences in the growing electric vehicle market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Tesla Model 3 is visibly cheaper – starting at 31,700 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model 3 is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 240 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers barely more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 449 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 3.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Tesla Model 3 delivers a bit more torque with 660 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is marginally lighter – 1,822 kg compared to 1,880 kg. The difference is around 58 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers a bit more boot space – 594 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries clearly more – 530 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 197 kg.
The Tesla Model 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.
details
The Tesla Model 3 is a compact electric sedan that pairs brisk, responsive driving with a sleek, minimalist cabin and intuitive, software-led features. It makes a practical, modern choice for daily commutes and long-term ownership while emphasizing simplicity and advanced driver assistance.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
|
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
530 kg
|
Payload
302 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España