Compare performance (449 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Volvo EX30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive world is constantly evolving, with electric vehicles (EVs) becoming increasingly popular among car enthusiasts and eco-conscious consumers alike. In this comparison, we pit the BYD Atto 3 against the Volvo EX30, two standout electric SUVs that combine cutting-edge technology with innovative designs. Let’s explore their technical specifications and innovations to see how they measure up.
Starting with their powertrains, the BYD Atto 3 features a single front-wheel-drive motor producing 204 horsepower and 310 Nm of torque. This setup allows it to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a respectable 7.3 seconds, making it a solid performer for city driving and weekend jaunts.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 offers multiple configurations, ranging from 272 to an impressive 428 horsepower. The all-wheel-drive options push its torque figures to a remarkable 543 Nm, allowing the EX30 to achieve 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.6 seconds, showcasing a genuine performance edge in its higher-tier variants.
In terms of electric range, the BYD Atto 3 shines with a robust performance, offering up to 420 km on a full charge. This makes it an ideal choice for daily commuting and weekend trips. Additionally, its impressive energy consumption rating of 16 kWh/100 km speaks to its overall efficiency.
Conversely, the Volvo EX30 provides varying ranges depending on the battery pack selected, from 339 km to a robust 476 km. While its efficiency peaks at 17 kWh/100 km, the higher-end variants with larger batteries still maintain a respectable range, making the EX30 a versatile option for longer journeys.
Space and comfort are key factors in any SUV. The BYD Atto 3 accommodates up to five occupants with a roomy interior, boasting 440 liters of trunk capacity—sufficient for family outings or road trips. Additionally, its thoughtful design ensures that passengers enjoy ample legroom and headspace, making it beneficial for longer travels.
The Volvo EX30, while a bit smaller in dimensions, emphasizes a premium interior experience. It offers a sleek Scandinavian design, with stylish finishes and high-quality materials. Although the trunk capacity is smaller at 318 liters, the EX30 makes up for it with innovative storage solutions and an overall ergonomic feel that enhances the driving experience.
Both vehicles have earned high marks for safety and technological advancements. The BYD Atto 3 features a robust suite of advanced driver assistance systems, including collision warning, lane-keeping assist, and a 360-camera setup, ensuring a secure driving experience.
Meanwhile, the Volvo EX30 showcases Volvo's commitment to safety with its intelligent safety systems, including Pilot Assist and an array of active safety features. Furthermore, the integration of cutting-edge technology allows for a fully digital dashboard, providing drivers with real-time data and connectivity options.
In conclusion, both the BYD Atto 3 and Volvo EX30 present compelling offerings for the electric SUV market, each with its own unique advantages. The Atto 3 stands out with its remarkable range, efficient powertrain, and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for family use.
On the contrary, the Volvo EX30 pulls ahead in terms of performance and luxurious interior, appealing to those prioritizing a dynamic driving experience alongside sophisticated design. Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual preferences and needs, but both models contribute to a brighter, greener automotive future.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo EX30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,571 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 35 km more than the Volvo EX30.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers marginally more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 428 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 3.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers marginally more torque with 560 Nm compared to 543 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The Volvo EX30 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
|
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España