@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
VS

Citroen C3 vs Ford Puma – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Citroen C3 meets Ford Puma.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

The Battle of the Crossovers: Citroen C3 vs. Ford Puma

When it comes to choosing the perfect compact SUV, the options seem endless. However, two standouts in the category for 2024—Citroen C3 and Ford Puma—bring innovation and distinctive styles, making them popular choices among car enthusiasts. Let's delve into a comparison between these two dynamic vehicles, exploring their technical aspects and innovative features.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Design and Dimensions

The Citroen C3 boasts a modern design with a focus on practicality. Its dimensions, measuring 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height, make it an agile choice for urban driving. The Ford Puma, slightly larger, ranges from 4186 mm to 4226 mm in length and 1805 mm in width, offering a bit more space, which is reflected in its expansive trunk capacity of up to 523 liters compared to the C3's 310 liters.

C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Engine Variants and Performance

The Citroen C3 provides a versatile lineup of engines, including petrol, hybrid, and fully electric variants. This model offers power outputs ranging from 101 to 113 HP and a maximum speed between 132 and 183 km/h. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies from 9.9 to 11 seconds, making the C3 ideal for both efficiency and performance enthusiasts.

Ford Puma also presents diverse engine options, with mild hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV) leading the lineup. It features power outputs between 125 and 168 HP, coupled with impressive acceleration figures from 7.4 to 9.8 seconds to reach 100 km/h. With a top speed extending to 210 km/h, the Puma satisfies those seeking a spirited driving experience.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Economy and Environmental Impact

The Citroen C3's fuel efficiency is commendable with consumption figures of 5.5 to 5.6 liters per 100 km for the petrol variants and 17.1 to 17.4 kWh per 100 km on electric. For those environmentally conscious, the C3 electric version offers an effective range of up to 326 km, adhering to a zero-emission driving experience.

Ford Puma's petrol MHEV models consume between 5.4 to 6 liters per 100 km, while the fully electric version is reported to use 13.1 to 13.7 kWh per 100 km, with a range maxing out at 376 km. These statistics make Puma an efficient choice with an environmentally friendly edge.

C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Innovative Features and Interior Comfort

Both vehicles come equipped with a plethora of innovative features. The Citroen C3 emphasizes comfort with its Advanced Comfort Program™ including plush seating and a well-insulated cabin for a quiet driving experience. Meanwhile, the Ford Puma also highlights a driver-centric cabin enriched with SYNC 3 infotainment and the inclusion of intuitive touch screens and enhanced driver aids.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

In conclusion, choosing between the Citroen C3 and Ford Puma depends on your priorities. The C3 appeals to those seeking versatility and eco-friendly options, while the Puma promises exhilarating performance and advanced technology. Both models are excellent choices in the compact SUV market, providing commendable specs and state-of-the-art innovations suited for any urban adventurer or eco-warrior.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen C3 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 13700 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 11066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C3 manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.50 kWh.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – achieving up to 376 km, about 52 km more than the Citroen C3.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a evident edge – offering 168 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Citroen C3 tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 27 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls distinct stronger with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Citroen C3 is slight lighter – 1226 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers decisively more room – 523 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 213 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 63 L more than the Citroen C3.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.

details
CITROEN_C3_25 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
CITROEN_C3_26 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
CITROEN_C3_44 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
12D30_01 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Citroen C3
Ford Puma
C3 @ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Consumption
Price
13700 - 23800 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
206 - 324 km
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
0 - 126 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1226 - 1518 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4015 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1755 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1567 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
1220 L
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
227 - 423 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
125 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C3
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C3
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Citroën C3 and Opel Corsa stand out with their distinct personalities and features. The C3 impresses with its quirky design and customizable options, appealing to those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Corsa offers a more refined …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
What drive types are available for the Citroen C3?

The Citroen C3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.