Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Citroen C3 vs Ford Puma - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (113 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (13700 £ vs 24800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Ford Puma?
C3
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Citroen C3 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 13700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11066 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C3 manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs a bit better – achieving up to 376 km, about 52 km more than the Citroen C3.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a evident edge – offering 168 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Citroen C3 tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 78 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls distinct stronger with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
C3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Citroen C3 is slight lighter – 1226 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers decisively more room – 523 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 213 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 63 L more than the Citroen C3.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Citroen C3
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Citroen C3
4.9 (2 Reviews)
The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.
details
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Citroen C3
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
13700 - 23800 £
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
206 - 324 km
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1226 - 1518 kg
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4015 mm
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
|
Width
1755 mm
|
Width
1805 mm
|
|
Height
1567 mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1220 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
|
Payload
227 - 423 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
125 - 132 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
What drive types are available for the Citroen C3?
The Citroen C3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.