Compare performance (113 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Ford Puma?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing the perfect compact SUV, the options seem endless. However, two standouts in the category for 2024—Citroen C3 and Ford Puma—bring innovation and distinctive styles, making them popular choices among car enthusiasts. Let's delve into a comparison between these two dynamic vehicles, exploring their technical aspects and innovative features.
The Citroen C3 boasts a modern design with a focus on practicality. Its dimensions, measuring 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height, make it an agile choice for urban driving. The Ford Puma, slightly larger, ranges from 4186 mm to 4226 mm in length and 1805 mm in width, offering a bit more space, which is reflected in its expansive trunk capacity of up to 523 liters compared to the C3's 310 liters.
The Citroen C3 provides a versatile lineup of engines, including petrol, hybrid, and fully electric variants. This model offers power outputs ranging from 101 to 113 HP and a maximum speed between 132 and 183 km/h. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies from 9.9 to 11 seconds, making the C3 ideal for both efficiency and performance enthusiasts.
Ford Puma also presents diverse engine options, with mild hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV) leading the lineup. It features power outputs between 125 and 168 HP, coupled with impressive acceleration figures from 7.4 to 9.8 seconds to reach 100 km/h. With a top speed extending to 210 km/h, the Puma satisfies those seeking a spirited driving experience.
The Citroen C3's fuel efficiency is commendable with consumption figures of 5.5 to 5.6 liters per 100 km for the petrol variants and 17.1 to 17.4 kWh per 100 km on electric. For those environmentally conscious, the C3 electric version offers an effective range of up to 326 km, adhering to a zero-emission driving experience.
Ford Puma's petrol MHEV models consume between 5.4 to 6 liters per 100 km, while the fully electric version is reported to use 13.1 to 13.7 kWh per 100 km, with a range maxing out at 376 km. These statistics make Puma an efficient choice with an environmentally friendly edge.
Both vehicles come equipped with a plethora of innovative features. The Citroen C3 emphasizes comfort with its Advanced Comfort Program™ including plush seating and a well-insulated cabin for a quiet driving experience. Meanwhile, the Ford Puma also highlights a driver-centric cabin enriched with SYNC 3 infotainment and the inclusion of intuitive touch screens and enhanced driver aids.
In conclusion, choosing between the Citroen C3 and Ford Puma depends on your priorities. The C3 appeals to those seeking versatility and eco-friendly options, while the Puma promises exhilarating performance and advanced technology. Both models are excellent choices in the compact SUV market, providing commendable specs and state-of-the-art innovations suited for any urban adventurer or eco-warrior.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,209 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 uses 5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the Citroen C3. That’s a difference of about 3.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 92 km more than the Citroen C3.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers visibly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers noticeably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is barely lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.
details
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,755 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
227 - 423 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España