VS

Citroen C3 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (113 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Skoda Enyaq?

Citroen C3 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly lighter

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen C3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,209 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the Citroen C3. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 262 km more than the Citroen C3.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 227 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 474 Nm more.

C3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is significantly lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 953 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more boot space – 585 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 275 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries moderately more – 489 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
Citroen C3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
Citroen C3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 126 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4,015 mm
Length
-
Width
1,755 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
1,567 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,220 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
227 - 423 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.