Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Ford Explorer EV comparison
Compare performance (180 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Ford Explorer EV?
Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Ford Explorer EV: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Jumpy Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Citroen Jumpy Transporter is barely cheaper – starting at 32,100 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,070 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is substantially more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 274 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.
Explorer EV
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 160 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 6.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is moderately lighter – 1,722 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 274 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries substantially more – 1,226 kg compared to 585 kg. That’s a difference of about 641 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Explorer EV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Ford Explorer EV
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Explorer EV
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.
details
Ford Explorer EV
The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.
details
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Explorer EV
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 199 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.