VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (41,400 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Mazda CX-30?

CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

CUPRA Terramar

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Terramar

Performance and Efficiency: CUPRA Terramar vs. Mazda CX-30

Both the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-30 make compelling arguments in the competitive SUV segment of 2024, but they are tailored for different kinds of drivers. Let's start by diving into the performance and efficiency details of these striking vehicles.

The CUPRA Terramar offers a variety of engine types, including a Plugin Hybrid and several petrol options, delivering power outputs ranging from 150 to 272 HP. The highlight is the Plugin Hybrid option, boasting a remarkable electric range of 120 km and an incredibly low consumption rate of 0.4 L/100km. On the other side, the Mazda CX-30, equipped predominantly with petrol mild hybrid engines, offers a maximum power of 186 HP and a noteworthy fuel efficiency of 5.7 L/100km.

CX-30

Driving Dynamics and Transmission

In terms of transmission, the CUPRA Terramar features a sleek dual-clutch automatic system that ensures rapid gear changes, enhancing the driving experience whether you're cruising through city streets or exploring rugged terrains. It offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options to cater to varied driving needs.

The Mazda CX-30 provides more traditional options with its choice of a manual gearbox or an automatic transmission, paired with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive mechanisms. This setup makes the CX-30 a versatile option for those who enjoy the tactile feedback of manual shifts or the convenience of automatics.

Terramar

Design and Dimensions

Dimensionally, the CUPRA Terramar presents itself as a larger and more imposing vehicle with a length of 4519 mm, a width of 1869 mm, and a height of 1586 mm. This contributes to its spacious interior and larger trunk capacity of 540 liters, perfect for family trips or adventurous getaways.

The Mazda CX-30 is slightly more compact, with a length of 4395 mm, a width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1540 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly smaller at 430 liters, which might be a consideration for those needing extra luggage space.

CX-30

Technical Sophistication and Innovations

Both SUVs come packed with modern technology aimed at improving safety and comfort. The CUPRA Terramar shines with its advanced Plugin Hybrid system, showcasing significant innovations in electric vehicle technology, while maintaining a sporty edge with its high torque output of up to 400 Nm in select models.

The Mazda CX-30 offers a refined suite of driving aids and infotainment options. Mazda's commitment to affordable luxury is evident through its array of safety features and the intuitive connect system, ensuring a smooth and enjoyable ride.

Terramar

Conclusion: Customizing Your SUV Experience

The CUPRA Terramar and Mazda CX-30 offer distinctive propositions in the SUV market. The Terramar provides cutting-edge hybrid technology and a spacious, adaptable design, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and innovation. Conversely, the CX-30 shines with its elegant simplicity, solid performance, and efficiency, especially suited for those who appreciate driving dynamics and traditional powertrains.

Ultimately, the choice between the CUPRA Terramar and Mazda CX-30 will heavily depend on your driving priorities—whether you lean towards state-of-the-art hybrid technologies or value the straightforward pleasure of driving a petrol-engine SUV.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is the statement-making electric coupé-SUV — sleek, silent and quick, perfect if you want emission-free performance and a futuristic showpiece. The Cupra Terramar is the more pragmatic, sharp-edged sibling: a compact petrol/hybrid SUV with better everyday usability, lower running …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Terramar

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 41,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,183 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the CUPRA Terramar uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.1 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar offers noticeably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the CUPRA Terramar delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

Terramar

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 183 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers visibly more boot space – 540 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries only slightly more – 542 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Terramar is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,400
Terramar

CUPRA Terramar

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 km
details
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Terramar

The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.

details
IMG_0231
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ

Reviews CUPRA Terramar

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
David Burrell
21 Jan 2026, 22:24:34

Had a Terramar for nearly 12 months and it’s proven a great choice. Love the driving experience and that fact it’s less common than Tiguan/Q3 cousins. V2 spec gives you so much kit you don’t need any extras.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
13 Jan 2026, 21:59:07

A better-equipped version of a car that's technically very similar to the Q3, offered at a more attractive price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Audi Q5
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Are you after classic polish or cheeky performance? We pit the Audi Q5’s grown-up refinement against the Cupra Terramar’s eager sportiness to see which mid-size SUV earns your money—and your grin.
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
CUPRA Terramar
Hyundai Tucson
VS
CUPRA Terramar dials up the drama with razor-sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a design that shouts performance — it's the hot-hatch of the SUV world for drivers who actually enjoy twisty roads. The Hyundai Tucson, by contrast, is a sensible all‑rounder: spacious, comfortable and economical, …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,400 - 50,600 £
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
36 - 191 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,869 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
512 - 542 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Mazda
Is the CUPRA Terramar offered with different drivetrains?

The CUPRA Terramar is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.