Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Dacia Spring vs Ford Explorer EV - Differences and prices compared
Spring
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Dacia Spring has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 14500 £, while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 19715 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Dacia Spring: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Explorer EV with 14.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.30 kWh.
As for range, the Ford Explorer EV performs clearly better – achieving up to 602 km, about 374 km more than the Dacia Spring.
Explorer EV
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV has a convincingly edge – offering 340 HP compared to 65 HP. That’s roughly 275 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 13.70 s. That’s about 8.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Explorer EV performs evident better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Dacia Spring tops out at 125 km/h. The difference is around 55 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Explorer EV pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 125 Nm. That’s about 554 Nm difference.
Spring
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Explorer EV offers slightly more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Dacia Spring is significantly lighter – 1013 kg compared to 1908 kg. The difference is around 895 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers noticeable more room – 450 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 142 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Explorer EV performs distinct better – up to 1422 L, which is about 418 L more than the Dacia Spring.
When it comes to payload, Ford Explorer EV significantly takes the win – 585 kg compared to 302 kg. That’s a difference of about 283 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Explorer EV proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Explorer EV is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £34,200
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
Dacia Spring
Ford Explorer EV
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dacia Spring
The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.
details
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Ford Explorer EV
5 (2 Reviews)
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Dacia Spring
Ford Explorer EV
|
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
14500 - 17100 £
|
Price
34200 - 48800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 14.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 17.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
225 - 228 km
|
Electric Range
360 - 602 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
26.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1013 - 1050 kg
|
Curb weight
1908 - 2179 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
Trunk capacity
445 - 450 L
|
|
Length
3701 mm
|
Length
4468 mm
|
|
Width
1583 mm
|
Width
1871 mm
|
|
Height
1519 mm
|
Height
1630 - 1639 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1004 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1417 - 1422 L
|
|
Payload
265 - 302 kg
|
Payload
561 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
44 - 65 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.7 - 19.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
125 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
113 - 125 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
33 - 48 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Ford
|
What drive types are available for the Dacia Spring?
The Dacia Spring is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.