Compare performance (102 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (14,500 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Spring or Ford Transit Transporter?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Dacia Spring is clearly cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 52,824 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 177 km more than the Dacia Spring.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 167 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 430 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 293 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 4.
The Dacia Spring is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,070 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,583 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
274 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
137 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Ford
|