VS

DS Automobiles N°4 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (33,600 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – DS Automobiles N°4 or Mazda CX-80?

DS Automobiles N°4 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

DS Automobiles N°4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

N°4

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

DS Automobiles N°4 is significantly cheaper – starting at 33,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,703 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the DS Automobiles N°4 uses 3 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the DS Automobiles N°4 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 449 km, about 389 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers markedly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 103 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the DS Automobiles N°4 takes 7.1 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, DS Automobiles N°4 is significantly lighter – 1,436 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.

Looking at boot space, the DS Automobiles N°4 offers noticeably more boot space – 430 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 542 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The DS Automobiles N°4 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,600
N°4

DS Automobiles N°4

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 77 - 449 km
DS Automobiles N°4
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

DS Automobiles N°4

The DS Automobiles N°4 showcases French elegance and innovation at its finest, blending luxury and cutting-edge technology seamlessly. This model is distinguished by its sophisticated design and attention to detail, offering a driving experience that resonates with both performance enthusiasts and lovers of style. As a hallmark of DS Automobiles' commitment to excellence, the N°4 continues to redefine what it means to drive a luxury vehicle, providing comfort and dynamic performance in equal measure.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
DS Automobiles N°4
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
33,600 - 47,600 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
77 - 449 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 136 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,436 - 1,792 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
360 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 542 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 224 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
96 - 165 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, A, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
DS Automobiles
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.