VS

Ferrari 296 Roadster vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (880 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (396,000 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ferrari 296 Roadster or Ford Ranger?

Ferrari 296 Roadster vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Ferrari 296 Roadster

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

Ford Ranger

  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

296 Roadster

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Ranger is substantially cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Ferrari 296 Roadster costs 396,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 347,561 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ferrari 296 Roadster with 8.9 L/100km. The difference is about 5.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more range – reaching up to 42 km, about 27 km more than the Ferrari 296 Roadster.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 296 Roadster offers substantially more power – delivering 880 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 599 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 296 Roadster is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari 296 Roadster delivers marginally more torque with 755 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 58 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari 296 Roadster is clearly lighter – 1,760 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 645 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 220 kg. That’s a difference of about 769 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
Ford Ranger and Toyota Land Cruiser go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the …
Ferrari 296 Roadster
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ferrari 296 Roadster

The Ferrari 296 GTS marries dramatic mid‑engine styling with razor‑sharp handling and a soundtrack that insists you drive it like you stole it. With the roof down it becomes an intoxicating open‑top thoroughbred that somehow also manages to be surprisingly usable day to day — a gorgeous, grin‑inducing reminder of why people fall for Ferraris.

details
serpimg_6LXpw0

Reviews Ferrari 296 Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Ranger
Isuzu D-Max
VS
In the competitive midsize pickup segment, the Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max offer robust performance and versatility for both work and recreation. The Ranger impresses with its powerful engine options and advanced technology features, while the D-Max is renowned for its durability and off-road …
Ford Ranger
VW Amarok
VS
In the competitive realm of midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and VW Amarok showcase distinctive strengths that cater to varied preferences. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its robust towing capacity and advanced tech features, making it a favorite for both rugged adventures and urban commuting. …
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Defender
VS
In the realm of rugged all-terrain vehicles, the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Defender stand out as iconic contenders. The Ford Ranger offers exceptional versatility and practicality, designed with a focus on comfort and modern technology, making it an excellent choice for both urban and off-road …
Ford Focus
Ford Ranger
VS
Ford Focus and Ford Ranger go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Focus or the Ford …
Ford Ranger
Volvo XC60
VS
Ford Ranger and Volvo XC60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Volvo …
Ford Ranger
Honda HR-V
VS
Ford Ranger and Honda HR-V go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Honda …
Ford Ranger
Honda Jazz
VS
Ford Ranger and Honda Jazz go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Honda …
Ford Ranger
SsangYong Rexton
VS
Ford Ranger and SsangYong Rexton go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the …
Ferrari 296 Roadster
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
Price
396,000 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
8.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
15 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
218 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
2
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,760 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,958 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
220 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
880 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
755 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
648 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
2,992 cm3
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Ferrari
Brand
Ford
Is the Ferrari 296 Roadster offered with different drivetrains?

The Ferrari 296 Roadster is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.