VS

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (95 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or Mazda CX-80?

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fiorino Qubo Van

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is significantly cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,549 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 232 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van takes 11.9 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is considerably lighter – 1,285 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 846 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.

details
serpimg_a22BOG

Reviews Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda …
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
VW Caddy
VS
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van and VW Caddy go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Fiat Fiorino Qubo …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-80 showcases a more compact and refined design aimed at urban drivers, whereas the Toyota Land Cruiser remains the robust choice for off-road adventurers. The CX-80 offers superior fuel efficiency and a technology-rich interior, ensuring a comfortable ride …
Mazda CX-80
Genesis GV80
VS
In the battle of luxury SUVs, the Mazda CX-80 and the Genesis GV80 both bring commendable attributes to the table. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek design and superior handling, exemplifying Mazda's commitment to driving pleasure. On the other hand, the Genesis GV80 stands out with its …
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
133 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
7
Doors
3
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,285 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
3,957 mm
Length
-
Width
1,716 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
535 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2016
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Mazda
Is the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van offered with different drivetrains?

The Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.