VS

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Volvo XC90 comparison

Compare performance (95 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or Volvo XC90?

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Volvo XC90: Key differences

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fiorino Qubo Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is considerably cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 57,526 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC90 uses 3.4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers substantially more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 311 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van takes 11.9 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers significantly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is considerably lighter – 1,285 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 795 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries clearly more – 710 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £74,300
XC90

Volvo XC90

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 250 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 69 km
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.

details

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption

Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
69 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
133 g/km
co2
71 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
7
Doors
3
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,285 kg
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
3,957 mm
Length
-
Width
1,716 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Height
1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
535 kg
Payload
600 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2016
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.