VS

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (21,000 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Tipo Wagon or Ford Ranger?

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Fiat Tipo Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Ford Ranger

  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tipo Wagon

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Tipo Wagon is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,448 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Fiat Tipo Wagon with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 151 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Fiat Tipo Wagon takes 9.1 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 377 Nm more.

Tipo Wagon

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Tipo Wagon is considerably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 950 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 514 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Hilux
VS
In the ongoing battle of the midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and Toyota Hilux both deliver rugged performance and reliability, making them favorites among adventure enthusiasts. The Ranger stands out with its dynamic driving experience and modern technology, while the Hilux is renowned for its …
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Tipo Wagon

The Fiat Tipo Estate is a no-nonsense family wagon that focuses on practicality and value, with surprisingly generous load space and comfortable seats for long trips. It won't win style awards, but its sensible kit, simple controls and low running costs make it a smart, unfussy choice for buyers who want function over flash.

details
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_05
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_06
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_13

Reviews Fiat Tipo Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
G.Piero
8 Apr 2026, 21:55:08

Value for money is its strong point...
Avoid the 3-cylinder petrol and the 1.3 mjt 95 hp — far too little to move 1,500 kg, very sluggish in acceleration.
The only and excellent compromise is the 1.6 mjt2 131 hp; despite weighing 1,500 kg it moves it with plenty of ease and verve (9.5 sec 0–100 km/h), giving real satisfaction.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Fiat Tipo Wagon
Peugeot 3008
VS
In the realm of family-oriented vehicles, the Fiat Tipo Station Wagon and the Peugeot 3008 present distinct approaches to practicality and style. The Fiat Tipo Station Wagon is celebrated for its spacious interior and exceptional value, offering a no-frills driving experience ideal for …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
Ford Ranger and Toyota Land Cruiser go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Ranger
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Nissan X-Trail is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Ranger
VW Touareg
VS
In the realm of versatile vehicles, the Ford Ranger and the VW Touareg appeal to distinct audiences yet both deliver exceptional capabilities. The Ford Ranger, known for its ruggedness and affordability, shines in off-road adventures and everyday utility. Meanwhile, the VW Touareg offers a …
Ford Ranger
VW Amarok
VS
In the competitive realm of midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and VW Amarok showcase distinctive strengths that cater to varied preferences. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its robust towing capacity and advanced tech features, making it a favorite for both rugged adventures and urban commuting. …
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
The Ford Ranger and Land Rover Range Rover compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Ranger
KGM Musso
VS
Ford Ranger and KGM Musso go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
BMW X5
Ford Ranger
VS
The BMW X5 and Ford Ranger compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,000 - 27,000 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,470 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,571 mm
Length
-
Width
1,792 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
1,514 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
206 - 207 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
1,469 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Fiat Tipo Wagon have?

The Fiat Tipo Wagon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.