VS

Ford Explorer EV vs Ferrari 296 Coupe comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 880 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 348,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Ferrari 296 Coupe?

Ford Explorer EV vs Ferrari 296 Coupe: Key differences

Ford Explorer EV

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
details

Ferrari 296 Coupe

  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Explorer EV

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Explorer EV is significantly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Ferrari 296 Coupe costs 348,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 314,657 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers considerably more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 587 km more than the Ferrari 296 Coupe.

296 Coupe

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 296 Coupe offers substantially more power – delivering 880 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 540 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 296 Coupe is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.3 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari 296 Coupe delivers a bit more torque with 755 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 76 Nm more.

Explorer EV

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Explorer EV offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari 296 Coupe is a bit lighter – 1,670 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries significantly more – 585 kg compared to 225 kg. That’s a difference of about 360 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Explorer EV
Kia EV3
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and the Kia EV3 represent two different takes on the modern electric SUV: the Explorer EV leans into traditional SUV strengths like space, towing and a commanding presence, while the EV3 focuses on efficiency, compact practicality and strong value. Which one suits you will come …
Ford Explorer EV
Kia EV5
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives like a burly, tech-laden American SUV — roomy, confident on the road and aimed at buyers who want presence and practicality in electric form. The Kia EV5 counters with sharper styling, clever packaging and a value-packed tech suite, making it the smarter, more …
Ford Explorer EV
Ferrari 296 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Explorer EV

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

details
339B09E4-87F0-4F47-8A68-7DA1B14BD783
46E73473-7BD4-4D0A-B7B7-433A0148B614
09A01900-4D34-480B-A9A5-1A89755E12FF

Reviews Ford Explorer EV

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Rene
26 May 2026, 14:29:47

problemfri, feels like a real car

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Olle Westberg
22 Feb 2026, 20:59:34

600 km real-world range in summer; handles me — I'm just over 190 cm and 100 kg.

Better looking than the ID.4 and often available at a really good price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
D.W.
29 Oct 2025, 18:09:06

I have owned and worked on Ford products for years and I am now driving an 07 Explorer 4.0 liter. 1 transmission and multiple soft parts and switches >300.000.
Klm. and still looks and runs great.
I am a Ford fan and will continue to be one, however the Rxplorer is looking dated. Come on you guys time for a Ford Home run. How about a totally resigned Ford Explorer. Hey how bout a diesel or a hybrid

Ferrari 296 Coupe

Slip behind the wheel of the Ferrari 296 GTB and you get a compact supercar that turns everyday roads into a racetrack with intoxicating urgency and razor-sharp poise. It's the perfect choice for drivers who want headline-grabbing performance and Ferrari drama without the showroom theatrics, all wrapped in stunning Italian design.

details
0c4a02aa-7ef0-4741-9475-1e235af2781d

Reviews Ferrari 296 Coupe

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Explorer EV represent two very different takes on driving: the Capri is a classic sporty coupe prized for its character and driving feel, while the Explorer EV is a modern electric SUV focused on range, technology and family practicality. This comparison will help you …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Elroq helps you decide between two different approaches to modern motoring. I’ll focus on range, interior space, driving dynamics, technology and ownership costs so you can pick the one that best matches your priorities.
Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Ford Explorer EV represent two different takes on the electric SUV — the Atto 3 is a compact, value-packed package while the Explorer EV aims at larger families with more range and performance. I’ll walk you through their real-world range, practicality, driving character and …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Explorer EV
VW ID.4
VS
The Ford Explorer EV brings American swagger to the MEB party with punchy performance and a clever sliding 14.6-inch screen, while the VW ID.4 counters with calm refinement, strong efficiency, and a well-proven ownership experience. Want character and kit for the money? Go Explorer; crave serenity …
Ford Explorer EV
Ferrari 296 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
Price
348,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
8.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Electric Range
15 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
Curb weight
1,670 kg
Trunk capacity
472 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,872 mm
Width
1,958 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
531 - 585 kg
Payload
225 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
880 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
755 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
648 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,992 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Ferrari
What drivetrain options does the Ford Explorer EV have?

The Ford Explorer EV is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.