Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Explorer EV vs Mazda CX-6e comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Mazda CX-6e?
Explorer EV
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Explorer EV is visibly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,648 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers moderately more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 118 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.
CX-6e
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm more.
Explorer EV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is somewhat lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 209 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers very slightly more boot space – 472 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries noticeably more – 585 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Explorer EV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Explorer EV
Mazda CX-6e
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Explorer EV
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.
details
Ford Explorer EV
Mazda CX-6e
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 48,800 £
|
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,205 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,935 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.