Compare performance (340 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Volvo XC90?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The rise of electric vehicles has prompted established automakers to innovate and upgrade their existing models. Today, we delve into a detailed comparison between two prominent SUVs that embody this trend: the all-electric Ford Explorer EV and the advanced Volvo XC90.
The Ford Explorer EV is designed with multiple power outputs, ranging from 170 HP to a robust 340 HP. Its electric powertrain offers rear-wheel or all-wheel drive, providing versatility and adaptability to various driving needs. Acceleration is swift, with the Explorer reaching from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 5.3 seconds, complemented by a peak torque of 679 Nm.
In contrast, the Volvo XC90 is available with hybrid powertrains, offering both petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) and a plug-in hybrid option. The most powerful variant delivers up to 455 HP, achieving a 0-100 km/h acceleration in 5.4 seconds. With a torque of 709 Nm, the XC90 does not fall short in providing a thrilling drive. It is worth noting that Volvo limits the maximum speed of their vehicles to 180 km/h, prioritizing safety as well as performance.
The Explorer EV shines with its impressive electric range, capable of covering up to 602 km on a single charge, thanks to its substantial battery capacity of up to 79 kWh. With a consumption rate ranging from 13.9 to 16.6 kWh/100 km, it stands as a testimony to Ford's commitment towards efficiency in electric mobility.
Volvo's XC90 plug-in hybrid offers a considerably smaller electric range, limited to 71 km, being more suited for shorter commutes on pure electric power. However, its hybrid technology does enable a remarkable combined fuel consumption of 1.2 L/100km, allowing for effective use over longer distances when driving as a hybrid.
Inside, the Ford Explorer EV accommodates five passengers and boasts a generous trunk capacity between 445 and 450 liters, balancing passenger comfort and cargo space. Its compact dimensions, with a length of 4468 mm and a width of 1871 mm, make it a smart choice for urban environments.
The Volvo XC90 offers a more spacious interior with seating for up to seven passengers. Although the trunk space is slightly smaller at 302 liters (or 262 liters depending on the configuration), the vehicle provides ample roomier accommodations, fitting for larger families or groups.
Ford's Explorer EV is a leader in sustainability, delivering an eco-friendly driving experience with zero CO2 emissions. This is emphasized by its A-class CO2 efficiency rating, showcasing its potential for a minimal carbon footprint.
Volvo's XC90 also steps into sustainability with a plug-in hybrid model that significantly reduces emissions to 30 g/km. Despite its mild hybrid counterpart exhibiting higher numbers, Volvo's inclusion of electric capabilities signals a clear commitment to reducing environmental impact.
The Ford Explorer EV and Volvo XC90 each bring their unique sets of strengths to the table. The Explorer EV is a prime choice for those seeking a fully electric SUV with an extensive range and impressive efficiency. On the other hand, the XC90, with its hybrid offerings and larger passenger capacity, appeals to drivers who require flexibility and a blend of traditional and renewable energy sources. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on specific needs, be it extended range electric driving or hybrid versatility.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Explorer EV is substantially cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,105 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 533 km more than the Volvo XC90.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers moderately more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 66 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Volvo XC90 takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers very slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is only slightly lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 84 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries a bit more – 710 kg compared to 585 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.
details
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
71 - 188 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
600 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España