Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Jeep Avenger – Which model is better for everyday use?
Two cars, one duel: Ford Kuga meets Jeep Avenger.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Avenger has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £, while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 12300 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Jeep Avenger performs significantly better – achieving up to 400 km, about 332 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Avenger
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 243 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs barely noticeable better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jeep Avenger pulls minimal stronger with 260 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is evident lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 346 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Kuga offers barely noticeable more room – 412 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs somewhat better – up to 1534 L, which is about 257 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga slight takes the win – 550 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Kuga shows itself to be secures victory with a clear margin and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,200
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
Ford Kuga
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Jeep Avenger
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Ford Kuga
Jeep Avenger
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1776 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.