Compare performance (243 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Clio?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,185 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Clio with 4.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers clearly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 85 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Kuga delivers visibly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is visibly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 324 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries slightly more – 550 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 87 kg.
The Ford Kuga stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
detailsThe Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
92 - 115 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,116 mm
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|