VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (56900 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Volvo XC60?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • slight lighter

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • hardly perceptible more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • minimal quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • distinct more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC60 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7723 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.30 L. The difference is about 9.50 L per 100 km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 446 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Ford Mustang Convertible takes 5 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Mustang Convertible performs evident better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 169 Nm difference.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo XC60 offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Ford Mustang Convertible is slight lighter – 1876 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 24 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers distinct more room – 483 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 decisively takes the win – 550 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 226 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Ford Mustang Convertible
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_11-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_28-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_12-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_25-LOW

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Ford Mustang Convertible

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Ford Mustang Convertible
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
56900 - 59900 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
61 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
2
Doors
5
Curb weight
1876 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4810 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1916 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1403 mm
Height
1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1543 L
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
250 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
5038 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Discovery Sport
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo XC60 or the Land Rover Discovery Sport is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct offerings. The X1 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging driving dynamics, while the XC60 captivates with its elegant design and emphasis on safety features. Ultimately, the choice between …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the compact SUV arena, the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 present distinct yet appealing offerings. The Karoq stands out with its practicality and value-driven features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the XC60, with its premium materials and advanced …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
Is the Ford Mustang Convertible offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.