Compare performance (190 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Karoq or Volvo XC60?
In the competitive world of SUVs, the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 are two contenders that cater to drivers who value a mix of practicality, power, and innovation. These two vehicles, both from the 2024 model year, provide a compelling choice for different segments of the market. Here, we delve into a detailed comparison to see which might suit your driving needs better.
The Skoda Karoq offers a range of engine options including both petrol and diesel variants. With power outputs ranging from 115 to 190 HP, the Karoq caters to a wide array of driving preferences. The Karoq features both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, and offers options for both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. Its efficient fuel consumption, approximately between 4.9 and 7.6 L/100km, makes it a practical choice for daily commutes and longer journeys alike. Acceleration times vary, with the quickest model achieving 0-100 km/h in 7 seconds.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 ups the ante with its hybrid engine options, including a petrol mild hybrid and a plug-in hybrid. With power outputs of 250 HP, 398 HP, and up to 455 HP, the XC60 is a powerhouse designed for performance enthusiasts. It uses an automatic transmission to complement its all-wheel drive, delivering a seamless driving experience. The plug-in hybrid model impresses with a combined fuel consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of up to 80 km, making it an environmentally conscious option with an 0-100 km/h acceleration time of just 4.9 seconds.
Both SUVs offer ample seating for five passengers. The Skoda Karoq focuses on practicality, featuring a trunk capacity of 521 liters, which is larger than the XC60's 483 or 468 liters, depending on the configuration. Despite being the smaller SUV with a length of 4390 mm and width of 1841 mm, the Karoq is designed to maximize usable space.
The Volvo XC60, while slightly larger at 4688 mm in length and 1902 mm in width, is geared towards luxury and comfort. It boasts a more lavish interior, equipped with premium materials and advanced technology, making it an appealing option for those prioritizing a high-end driving experience.
When it comes to driving dynamics, the Karoq is more about versatility and fuel efficiency. It offers a comfortable ride with responsive handling, ideal for city driving and weekend getaways. Its all-wheel-drive option provides added stability, particularly useful in challenging road conditions.
The Volvo XC60, however, stands out with its innovative approach. Advanced driver assistance systems, along with a suite of safety features, ensure a secure and high-tech driving environment. Its all-wheel-drive system, combined with optional air suspension, provides a smoother ride and optimal handling across various terrains.
In conclusion, both the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 offer compelling features that cater to different needs. While the Karoq is a solid choice for those seeking value, efficiency, and practicality in an SUV, the XC60 appeals to drivers looking for luxury, power, and cutting-edge technology. The decision ultimately comes down to what you prioritize in a vehicle: the affordable versatility of the Karoq or the luxurious innovation of the XC60. Choose the one that best fits your lifestyle and driving desires.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Karoq is clearly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,195 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 216 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Karoq takes 7 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 669 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is clearly lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 770 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries only slightly more – 549 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
The Volvo XC60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España