@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Skoda Karoq vs Volvo XC60 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Skoda Karoq or Volvo XC60?

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

A Tale of Two SUVs: Skoda Karoq vs Volvo XC60

In the competitive world of SUVs, the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 are two contenders that cater to drivers who value a mix of practicality, power, and innovation. These two vehicles, both from the 2024 model year, provide a compelling choice for different segments of the market. Here, we delve into a detailed comparison to see which might suit your driving needs better.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Under the Hood: Power and Performance

The Skoda Karoq offers a range of engine options including both petrol and diesel variants. With power outputs ranging from 115 to 190 HP, the Karoq caters to a wide array of driving preferences. The Karoq features both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, and offers options for both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. Its efficient fuel consumption, approximately between 4.9 and 7.6 L/100km, makes it a practical choice for daily commutes and longer journeys alike. Acceleration times vary, with the quickest model achieving 0-100 km/h in 7 seconds.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 ups the ante with its hybrid engine options, including a petrol mild hybrid and a plug-in hybrid. With power outputs of 250 HP, 398 HP, and up to 455 HP, the XC60 is a powerhouse designed for performance enthusiasts. It uses an automatic transmission to complement its all-wheel drive, delivering a seamless driving experience. The plug-in hybrid model impresses with a combined fuel consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of up to 80 km, making it an environmentally conscious option with an 0-100 km/h acceleration time of just 4.9 seconds.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior Comfort and Space

Both SUVs offer ample seating for five passengers. The Skoda Karoq focuses on practicality, featuring a trunk capacity of 521 liters, which is larger than the XC60's 483 or 468 liters, depending on the configuration. Despite being the smaller SUV with a length of 4390 mm and width of 1841 mm, the Karoq is designed to maximize usable space.

The Volvo XC60, while slightly larger at 4688 mm in length and 1902 mm in width, is geared towards luxury and comfort. It boasts a more lavish interior, equipped with premium materials and advanced technology, making it an appealing option for those prioritizing a high-end driving experience.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Driving Dynamics and Innovations

When it comes to driving dynamics, the Karoq is more about versatility and fuel efficiency. It offers a comfortable ride with responsive handling, ideal for city driving and weekend getaways. Its all-wheel-drive option provides added stability, particularly useful in challenging road conditions.

The Volvo XC60, however, stands out with its innovative approach. Advanced driver assistance systems, along with a suite of safety features, ensure a secure and high-tech driving environment. Its all-wheel-drive system, combined with optional air suspension, provides a smoother ride and optimal handling across various terrains.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Conclusion: A Choice of Preferences

In conclusion, both the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 offer compelling features that cater to different needs. While the Karoq is a solid choice for those seeking value, efficiency, and practicality in an SUV, the XC60 appeals to drivers looking for luxury, power, and cutting-edge technology. The decision ultimately comes down to what you prioritize in a vehicle: the affordable versatility of the Karoq or the luxurious innovation of the XC60. Choose the one that best fits your lifestyle and driving desires.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Karoq has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 20109 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.90 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 265 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Karoq takes 7 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs slightly better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls decisively stronger with 709 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 349 Nm difference.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is noticeable lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 520 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers barely noticeable more room – 521 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs slight better – up to 1630 L, which is about 87 L more than the Volvo XC60.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 minimal takes the win – 550 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,200
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Skoda Karoq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ Volvo Cars
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each offering a blend of practicality and style. The Tucson impresses with its bold design and advanced technology features, while the Karoq stands out for its spacious interior and excellent …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC60
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 41700 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
128 - 173 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1841 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
456 - 549 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Skoda Karoq stand out with their impressive blend of style and functionality. While the Sportage boasts a bold design with advanced tech features, the Karoq emphasizes practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq offers practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families and those seeking comfort. While the …
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Duster
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each catering to distinct buyer preferences. The Duster offers an impressive value proposition with its rugged design and practical features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Karoq?

The Skoda Karoq is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.