VS

Ford Mustang Coupe vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (453 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (51,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Coupe or Renault Clio?

Ford Mustang Coupe vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Ford Mustang Coupe

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • significantly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Coupe

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Coupe costs 51,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,714 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Mustang Coupe with 12 L/100km. The difference is about 7.9 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Coupe offers clearly more power – delivering 453 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 295 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Coupe is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Ford Mustang Coupe is visibly faster – reaching 263 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 83 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Coupe delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is significantly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,808 kg. The difference is around 606 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Coupe offers a bit more boot space – 381 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries visibly more – 463 kg compared to 334 kg. That’s a difference of about 129 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Ford Mustang Coupe
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Coupe

The Ford Mustang Coupe wears its muscle on its sleeve, delivering a raw, grin-inducing driving experience that turns everyday roads into a little theater of noise and swagger. Inside it's surprisingly livable for regular use, so if you want headline-grabbing looks and a proper driver's car without pretending to be a luxury cruiser, the Mustang coupe is a very entertaining choice.

details

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
Ford Mustang Coupe
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

Price
51,800 - 65,600 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
12 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
275 - 282 g/km
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
61 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
2
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,808 - 1,837 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
381 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,810 - 4,819 mm
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,916 - 1,917 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,398 - 1,404 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
327 - 334 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 - 453 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 5.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
250 - 263 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
328 - 334 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.