VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Ariya comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 435 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 37,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Nissan Ariya?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Ariya: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • moderately more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • very slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Ariya is noticeably cheaper – starting at 37,300 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,151 £.

When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 17.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers moderately more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 69 km more than the Nissan Ariya.

Ariya

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a bit more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 435 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Nissan Ariya takes 5 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers noticeably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 600 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Ariya is very slightly lighter – 1,980 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers marginally more boot space – 519 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries only slightly more – 450 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
37,300 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 24.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
402 - 531 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
63 - 87 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,980 - 2,277 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
415 - 468 L
Length
-
Length
4,595 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
1,650 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,280 - 1,350 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
363 - 420 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
218 - 435 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
300 - 600 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
160 - 320 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.