Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs BYD Atto 2 – Differences & prices compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or BYD Atto 2?
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the BYD Atto 2 costs 27400 £. That’s a price difference of around 2649 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the BYD Atto 2 with 16 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.90 kWh.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 376 km, about 64 km more than the BYD Atto 2.
Atto 2
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 2 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 177 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs evident better – reaching 210 km/h, while the BYD Atto 2 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 290 Nm.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1570 kg. The difference is around 254 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 2 performs slight better – up to 1340 L, which is about 57 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma somewhat takes the win – 469 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Puma proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
BYD Atto 2
The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
details
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Ford Puma
BYD Atto 2
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
27400 - 30000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
312 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1570 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4310 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1830 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1340 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
177 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
130 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
BYD
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.