Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs BYD Atto 2 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or BYD Atto 2?
Ford Puma vs BYD Atto 2: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the BYD Atto 2 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 2. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 2 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 430 km, about 13 km more than the Ford Puma.
Atto 2
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 2 offers clearly more power – delivering 212 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.5 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 2 delivers barely more torque with 310 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 2 carries barely more – 490 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BYD Atto 2 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,800
BYD Atto 2
Ford Puma
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
BYD Atto 2
The BYD Atto 2 is a stylish compact electric SUV that blends bold exterior design with a roomy, tech-focused interior, making it well suited to daily driving and urban life. It delivers a comfortable ride and practical features that will appeal to buyers looking for a modern, user-friendly EV.
details
Ford Puma
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
30,800 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 72 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
425 - 450 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
BYD
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.