Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Citroen C3 Aircross comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 16,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Citroen C3 Aircross?
Ford Puma vs Citroen C3 Aircross: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen C3 Aircross is clearly cheaper – starting at 16,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,466 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 Aircross uses 5.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.1 kWh/100km for the Citroen C3 Aircross. That’s a difference of about 3.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 17 km more than the Citroen C3 Aircross.
C3 Aircross
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is marginally lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 460 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Citroen C3 Aircross
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Citroen C3 Aircross
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a compact crossover that stands out with its quirky, friendly styling and a tall, airy cabin that prioritizes comfort. It suits buyers who value flexible interior space, good visibility and easy urban driving over sporty performance.
details
Ford Puma
Citroen C3 Aircross
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
16,400 - 29,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
307 - 400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Citroen
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.