VS

Ford Puma vs Dacia Duster comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 16,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Dacia Duster?

Ford Puma vs Dacia Duster: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

Dacia Duster

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Compact SUV Showdown: Dacia Duster vs. Ford Puma

In the ever-competitive compact SUV market, two models have captured attention with their distinct offerings: the Dacia Duster and the Ford Puma. Both vehicles are targeted at drivers seeking a balance between utility, performance, and economy, but they bring these elements to life in unique ways. In this comparison, we'll delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two apart.

Duster

Performance and Engine Choice

The 2024 Dacia Duster offers a diverse range of engine options that include LPG, full hybrid, and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle). The horsepower varies from 91 HP to 140 HP, allowing for choices based on individual performance requirements. The Duster also stands out with potential drive options of either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive—a handy feature for those adventurous enough to take their SUV off the beaten path.

On the other hand, the Ford Puma embraces a more modern engine lineup for its 2024/2025 models, focusing on petrol MHEV and electric options. With power outputs ranging from 125 HP to 168 HP, the Puma aims squarely at efficiency and lower emissions, evident from its front-wheel drive-only setup that maximizes fuel economy and driving ease.

Puma

Efficiency and Consumption

Fuel consumption is an essential factor for any SUV owner today. The Dacia Duster offers a consumption range from 5 L/100km to 8.1 L/100km, shaped by its diverse powertrain options.

Ford Puma’s pursuit of champions in efficiency shows with numbers like 5.4 L/100km on its MHEV variants and even less when considering the electric models, which boast a consumption of 13.1 kWh/100km. An all-electric range up to 376 km adds another edge in sustainability that might appeal to eco-conscious consumers.

Duster

Interior Space and Design

Interior design and space utilization are crucial considerations in this vehicle category. The Duster’s rugged persona extends into its spacious interior, accommodating five passengers comfortably, with a trunk capacity peaking at 517 liters.

The Puma, while slightly more compact in length, optimizes its space impeccably with a trunk capacity reaching 523 liters. Given its clever space management and attractive design, the Puma appeals to those preferring a sleeker urban SUV without sacrificing cargo volume.

Puma

Innovations and Technology

While not historically known for tech extravagance, Dacia has infused the Duster with sensible technological improvements and engine versatility to attract a broader range of consumers.

Conversely, the Ford Puma aims to impress with its hybrid systems and advanced drive assistance technologies that adequately complement its modern powertrains. Tech-savvy buyers will appreciate the Puma’s dual-clutch automatic transmission and the available all-electric drive variant.

Duster

Conclusion: Choosing Between the Duster and Puma

Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Ford Puma ultimately depends on what you value most in an SUV. The Duster stands as an all-terrain champion with diverse engine choices and drive configurations. The Ford Puma, however, sets the stage for urban sophistication with superior efficiency, high-tech features, and future-forward powertrains. Both are commendable in their rights, offering unique propositions in the competitive compact SUV landscape.

For those set on efficiency and modern technology, the Puma is an intriguing choice. However, if versatility and adventurism are your goals, the Duster may just be the perfect fit.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Dacia Duster
Dacia Jogger
VS
The Dacia Duster is the rugged, no-nonsense compact SUV that feels ready for gravel tracks and weekend escapes without costing the earth — pick it if you want a bit of adventure in a brutally honest, affordable package. The Dacia Jogger, by contrast, is a clever, spacious seven-seater that trades …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Dacia Duster is significantly cheaper – starting at 16,300 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,637 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Dacia Duster uses 4.7 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Duster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Dacia Duster takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers markedly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,377 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Dacia Duster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Dacia Duster

The Dacia Duster is a no-nonsense compact SUV that delivers rugged practicality and surprisingly comfortable everyday driving without fuss. It might not win any beauty contests, but its honest design, easy-to-live-with cabin and tough attitude make it a smart pick for buyers who want reliable transport without luxury frills.

details
d220402p
Dacia_Duster_2
d220403p
d220404p

Reviews Dacia Duster

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Buh
14 Dec 2025, 22:40:05

I find the difference between the two very minimal.
And for almost €20k more 💶 I would absolutely not choose the Tiguan.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Dacia Duster
Dacia Sandero
VS
If you need a proper SUV silhouette, more room and rough-road confidence, the Dacia Duster is the sensible adventurer — higher ride height, optional 4x4 and a generous boot make it the one to choose for family trips and gravel tracks. But if you mainly commute, squeeze into city parking and care …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Dacia Duster still shocks with back-to-basics toughness and an unbeatable price — real off-road chops and a cavernous boot for a fraction of the bill — while the Suzuki Vitara answers with sharper handling, nicer interior materials and smarter tech that feels a touch more grown-up. Choose the …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Dacia Duster
Renault Captur
VS
Think of the Dacia Duster as the bargain-basement SUV that treats rough roads like a challenge and your wallet like a VIP—rugged, simple and brutally practical. The Renault Captur, by contrast, is the fashion-forward city slicker with sharper looks, more tech and a softer ride, ideal if you want …
Dacia Duster
Opel Frontera
VS
The Dacia Duster is the sensible new-school pick — affordable, economical and surprisingly well packaged with modern safety and infotainment for the money; the Opel Frontera, meanwhile, is a proper old-school body-on-frame bruiser that still appeals to buyers who prize simple, rugged off-road …
Ford Puma
Dacia Duster

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
16,300 - 24,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
107 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,377 - 1,559 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
348 - 517 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,813 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
402 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, LPG
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 11.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
190 - 230 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Dacia
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.