Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Fiat Grande Panda comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 113 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 16,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Fiat Grande Panda?
Ford Puma vs Fiat Grande Panda: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Fiat Grande Panda is clearly cheaper – starting at 16,300 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,637 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Grande Panda uses 5.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.8 kWh/100km for the Fiat Grande Panda. That’s a difference of about 3.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 97 km more than the Fiat Grande Panda.
Grande Panda
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers markedly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Fiat Grande Panda takes 11.2 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers noticeably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Fiat Grande Panda is very slightly lighter – 1,295 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 111 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Fiat Grande Panda
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Fiat Grande Panda
The Grande Panda is a delightful blend of practicality and charm, making it a popular choice for urban dwellers and families alike. With its compact design, the car navigates city streets effortlessly while providing ample interior space for passengers and cargo. Its quirky styling and user-friendly features make the Grande Panda not just a mode of transport, but a fun driving experience.
details
Ford Puma
Fiat Grande Panda
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
16,300 - 25,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
320 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 131 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,295 - 1,554 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
361 - 412 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,763 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
353 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 113 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 - 11.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
122 - 205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Fiat
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.