VS

Ford Puma vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 12077 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 5 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 253 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a distinct edge – offering 265 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 368 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 387 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 822 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq a bit takes the win – 545 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty handling and stylish design, appealing to those who crave a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG4, with its affordable pricing and generous equipment list, offers a compelling alternative, particularly for those prioritizing value for money. Both models bring unique strengths, making the choice largely dependent on whether the buyer seeks spirited performance or practical features.
Ford Puma
Skoda Kodiaq
Puma
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV landscape, the Skoda Kodiaq and Dacia Bigster offer distinct advantages for buyers seeking practicality and value. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, making it a top choice for families. In contrast, the Bigster appeals to budget-conscious consumers with its robust design and functionality, proving that affordability doesn't have to compromise style or capability.
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLB and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their unique blend of luxury and practicality. While the GLB boasts a premium interior and advanced technology features, the Kodiaq excels in space and functionality, making it a family-friendly choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preferences, whether it's the opulence of the GLB or the value and versatility of the Kodiaq.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its spacious interior and family-friendly features, making it a top choice for those prioritizing comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the VW Tayron impresses with its stylish design and refined driving dynamics, appealing to those seeking a more premium experience. While both models share a common platform, their distinct personalities cater to different driver preferences, making this comparison essential for prospective buyers.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.