VS

Ford Puma vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Kodiaq?

Ford Puma vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • visibly lighter
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,963 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 295 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 368 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more boot space – 910 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 387 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries slightly more – 563 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq
VS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq is a matchup between a compact, city-oriented crossover and a more conventional Skoda SUV offering (marketed here as the Epiq). This comparison focuses on what matters to real buyers: space, practicality, driving feel, running costs and which car suits which type of …
Skoda Kodiaq
Jaecoo 7
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and Jaecoo 7 are midsize SUVs aimed at families, but they're very different — the Kodiaq emphasizes European refinement, practicality and proven driving dynamics, while the Jaecoo 7 undercuts on price with generous tech and equipment from a newer Chinese brand. This comparison …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq are two popular midsize SUVs that balance everyday practicality with family-friendly space and efficient powertrains. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, interior room, tech and running costs so you can quickly see which suits your priorities best.
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra
VS
The Ford Puma and Nissan Micra both aim at city-minded drivers but take different paths: the Puma is a compact crossover that prioritises space, ride comfort and practicality, while the Micra is a small hatchback built around affordability, simplicity and easy urban manoeuvring. Choose the Puma if …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Ford Puma
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.