Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Toyota Corolla Touring Sports – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Toyota Corolla Touring Sports.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports costs 29600 £. That’s a price difference of around 4834 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Corolla Touring Sports manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
Corolla Touring Sports
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 178 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports takes 7.50 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1485 kg. The difference is around 169 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports offers a bit more room – 596 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1606 L, which is about 323 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £29,600
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
The Toyota Corolla Touring Sports is a sensible yet stylish estate that blends everyday practicality with Toyota's trademark reliability, making it the kind of car that quietly gets on with family life without drama. Inside it's cleverly packaged for luggage and kids' gear and feels calm and comfortable on the road — sensible rather than flashy, but with enough character to make daily drives more enjoyable.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Ford Puma
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
29600 - 36400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.40 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
100 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1485 - 1515 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
581 - 596 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4650 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1790 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1435 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1591 - 1606 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
400 - 440 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 178 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 131 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.