VS

Ford Puma vs Volvo XC60 – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo XC60?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 24420 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 2.60 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs clearly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 294 km more than the Volvo XC60.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 287 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls convincingly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 419 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 584 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers minimal more room – 523 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs somewhat better – up to 1543 L, which is about 260 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 somewhat takes the win – 550 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo XC60 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £49,200
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 strikes a perfect balance between contemporary design and practical functionality, making it an appealing choice for those in search of a reliable and stylish SUV. Its interior showcases a blend of high-quality materials and innovative technology, ensuring a comfortable and seamless driving experience. With its emphasis on safety and environmental sustainability, the XC60 continues to stand out in the competitive SUV market.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ media.volvocars.com
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
Volvo XC60
Puma
XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a versatile SUV for both urban and adventurous lifestyles. Ultimately, both vehicles offer unique strengths, catering to different preferences in the competitive midsize SUV market.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety features and Scandinavian design, appealing to buyers looking for both security and aesthetics in their driving experience.
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious experience with advanced safety features and a refined design, appealing to those who seek a more premium driving experience.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a higher driving position and ample space, making it the ideal choice for those seeking versatility without compromising on elegance.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.